FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W137293484> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W137293484 abstract "The aim of this research is to discuss how to effectively increase survey response and retention rates in online panels, a burning issue which can be viewed as a marketing problem in the social sciences. The author firstly considers the theory behind the methods for motivating people to participate in a survey, to respond and to remain for the full duration of a study. Then three hypotheses are formulated and tested in order to investigate the effects of combined strategies on participation and attrition. By means of a web-based panel experiment the research draws the attention to empirical evidence of phenomena that could be exploited in order to increase survey response and panel retention rates, namely the respondent tendency to lie and the trend of his trust in the inquirers. In order to enhance the construct validity a quantitative experiment and a qualitative research are integrated in a mixed approach design. The findings suggest that the trend of dropout is weaker when the relationship with the inquirers is framed as based on something like reciprocity than when it isn’t. Furthermore increasing tendency to lie in completing the questionnaire and diminishing declared trust in survey authors and sponsors seem to work as effective predictors of dropouts and non-responses in following experiment waves. And so two indices are proposed that can help panel managers to monitor the willingness to respond: the Pinocchio Ratio and the Candide Ratio. In short the research implies that stressing the reciprocity features of relationship can’t increase survey response but can reduce panel attrition in web-based studies. Moreover it points out that the more respondents tend to lie, the less they are willing to participate in following panel waves. Furthermore the less inquirers enjoy the trust of people under investigations, the more panelists are likely to drop out and to non-respond.Nevertheless this study with the reported online experiment is not without limitations: on the one hand having recourse to all the members of a sub-population and not to a probability sample of the overall population may weaken the chance of generalize the findings. On the other hand using different amount of questionnaires and diverse intervals between waves and reminders could affect the results.The main practical implication for marketing research and social sciences investigations at-large lies in the remark that reciprocity framework used as incentive doesn’t seem to be very effective in increasing response rate of one-time survey: therefore spending on implementation could be deemed unnecessary to do. On the contrary, in panels where the relationship with the inquirers is framed as based on reciprocity something happens. So it’s worthwhile considering the possibility of inserting in online questionnaires some items that can provide answers which work as predictors of future dropouts or non-responses. These items enable inquirers to monitor willingness to respond through the proposed indices and allow panel managers to intervene promptly in order to limit attrition. The originality and the value of the study come from the choice made by the author of collecting and processing a large e-mails data bank that represents an overall sub-population with some descriptive characteristics well known. In fact the previous knowledge of some respondent’s socio-demographic aspects enabled an easier analysis of lies which was added to the estimate of declared trust: that allowed the construction of the two indices working as predictors, namely the Pinocchio Ratio and the Candide Ratio." @default.
• W137293484 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W137293484 creator A5001119050 @default.
• W137293484 date "2012-03-16" @default.
• W137293484 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W137293484 title "Collecting effectively information from people in web: a marketing challenge for social sciences" @default.
• W137293484 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W137293484 type Work @default.
• W137293484 sameAs 137293484 @default.
• W137293484 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W137293484 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W137293484 hasAuthorship W137293484A5001119050 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C169903001 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W137293484 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C10138342 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C144133560 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C15744967 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C162324750 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C162853370 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C169903001 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C17744445 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C182306322 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C199343813 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C199539241 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C2776640315 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C2780553607 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C39549134 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C71924100 @default.
• W137293484 hasConceptScore W137293484C77805123 @default.
• W137293484 hasLocation W1372934841 @default.
• W137293484 hasOpenAccess W137293484 @default.
• W137293484 hasPrimaryLocation W1372934841 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W137686125 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W1549334926 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W1625195535 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2006351456 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2008867237 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2105085692 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2115736965 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2185800939 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2185974357 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2292768431 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2590790181 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2766508051 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W2998593782 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W30407751 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W3125744006 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W52876413 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W53974964 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W755016379 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W835281885 @default.
• W137293484 hasRelatedWork W1593402180 @default.
• W137293484 isParatext "false" @default.
• W137293484 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W137293484 magId "137293484" @default.
• W137293484 workType "article" @default.