Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W137882179> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W137882179 endingPage "35" @default.
- W137882179 startingPage "329" @default.
- W137882179 abstract "To examine actual use of formal benefit/cost and benefit/risk results in health system decision making by public and private healthcare organizations.A direct survey with questions about healthcare decisions made by the respondent or the respondent's organization. The scope of this survey precluded meaningful quantitative analysis, thus descriptive and qualitative analyses were performed.An initial questionnaire was tested in 2001 with 15 respondents in 4 countries. In 2002, a revised questionnaire was sent to a convenience sample of 116 individuals representing information users (providers, payers, and regulators) and information producers (technology firms and academics) in France, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Responses were received from 104 people (89.7%).Every information user employed benefit/risk analyses to accept or reject new interventions and delete existing technologies. In addition, 42.1% of information users also used formal benefit/cost results (cost effectiveness, cost benefit, and/or cost utility). Seven providers/payers in the United States, 1 in France, and 1 in the United Kingdom required such analyses, as did 1 UK regulator. Most did not produce their own analyses but relied on those of public organizations (eg, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute of Clinical Effectiveness), academics, and pharmaceutical firms.A surprisingly high percent of information users (42.1%) employed any formal economic cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, or cost utility analysis, CEA, CBA, or CUA evaluations in deciding whether to accept, pay for, or reject new interventions or to delete old interventions. Still, this figure was substantially higher than expected given the results of previous studies, nearly all of which found low use of formal benefit/risk and benefit/cost analyses." @default.
- W137882179 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W137882179 creator A5007979705 @default.
- W137882179 date "2004-05-01" @default.
- W137882179 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W137882179 title "Use of formal benefit/cost evaluations in health system decision making." @default.
- W137882179 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15152703" @default.
- W137882179 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W137882179 type Work @default.
- W137882179 sameAs 137882179 @default.
- W137882179 citedByCount "17" @default.
- W137882179 countsByYear W1378821792012 @default.
- W137882179 countsByYear W1378821792013 @default.
- W137882179 countsByYear W1378821792020 @default.
- W137882179 countsByYear W1378821792022 @default.
- W137882179 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W137882179 hasAuthorship W137882179A5007979705 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W137882179 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C127454912 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C144133560 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C159110408 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C160735492 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C162118730 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C162324750 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C162853370 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C17744445 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C18903297 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C199539241 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C27415008 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C2776640315 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C50522688 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C71924100 @default.
- W137882179 hasConceptScore W137882179C86803240 @default.
- W137882179 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W137882179 hasLocation W1378821791 @default.
- W137882179 hasOpenAccess W137882179 @default.
- W137882179 hasPrimaryLocation W1378821791 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W137882179 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W2081126723 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W2726866519 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W3025474702 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W3029064890 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W4226351000 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W1541063329 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W2181968632 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W2186983173 @default.
- W137882179 hasRelatedWork W2908537979 @default.
- W137882179 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W137882179 isParatext "false" @default.
- W137882179 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W137882179 magId "137882179" @default.
- W137882179 workType "article" @default.