FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W141256622> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W141256622 endingPage "162" @default.
• W141256622 startingPage "162" @default.
• W141256622 abstract "Roughly 13% of a nationally representative sample of 1,880 15-19-year-old males approve of abortion in each of eight circumstances presented to them, while about 4% disapprove in every instance. The proportions agreeing that abortion is acceptable range as high as 85-90% if the pregnancy endangers the woman's health or results from rape. Any type of religious affiliation, especially religious fundamentalism, is related to weaker support for abortion; an even stronger correlate of abortion attitudes is the importance of religion to the respondent. Abortion attitudes vary little by race after other social background factors are controlled. Those with more liberal attitudes toward premarital sex and those who perceive that they would be upset if they became a father in the immediate future are particularly likely to express acceptance of abortion. Roughly 61% of adolescent males do not feel that it would be all right for a woman to have an abortion if her partner objects, indicating a possible gender conflict of interest over the abortion issue.The 1988 National Survey of Adolescent Males (NSAM) included 1880 males. The sample was identified using the Institute for Survey Research's Probability Sampling Frame based on 1980 census data; it was designed to be representative of the noninstitutionalized population of never-married males aged 15-19 in the US. Multivariate models use weighted data based on the total sample. In the study, the following measures were used: attitudes toward abortion, preference for abortion over other options, social background and attitudinal, sexual, and fertility variables. Nearly 90% agreed a little or a lot that abortion was acceptable if the pregnancy endangered the woman's health, and 86% agreed it was acceptable if the pregnancy resulted from rape. Young men were less supportive of abortion in the event the child might be born deformed or mentally defective. 60% of this sample agreed that abortion was acceptable in this instance. 35% approved of abortion if the male partner would not support the child, and 43% approved if the women felt she could not afford to take care of the child. About a third agreed that abortion was acceptable for any reason. The first multivariate regression model examined the 8-item scale for young males abortion attitudes and explained 19% of the variance. The 2 social-class variables (parental education and neighborhood quality) were positively related to support for abortion. The religion variables were also significantly related to abortion attitudes. The second model examined males' perceptions of abortion in the context of a rape or when the mother might experience physical complications if she carried her pregnancy to term. Results from the model that examined the social and economic reasons for abortion revealed a pattern of significant variables almost identical to those found in a model for the range of attitudes toward abortion. 61% of the males felt that it was not correct for a women to opt for an abortion is the partner objected, which was indicative of a gender conflict of interest." @default.
• W141256622 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W141256622 creator A5016646854 @default.
• W141256622 creator A5090005139 @default.
• W141256622 date "1993-07-01" @default.
• W141256622 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W141256622 title "Adolescent Males' Abortion Attitudes: Data from a National Survey" @default.
• W141256622 cites W1982307774 @default.
• W141256622 cites W1989527530 @default.
• W141256622 cites W1990202877 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2070023052 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2075333187 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2115423240 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2119215896 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2124380285 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2403580442 @default.
• W141256622 cites W2523134325 @default.
• W141256622 cites W77382484 @default.
• W141256622 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/2135924" @default.
• W141256622 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8405342" @default.
• W141256622 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W141256622 type Work @default.
• W141256622 sameAs 141256622 @default.
• W141256622 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222012 @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222013 @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222015 @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222016 @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222018 @default.
• W141256622 countsByYear W1412566222019 @default.
• W141256622 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W141256622 hasAuthorship W141256622A5016646854 @default.
• W141256622 hasAuthorship W141256622A5090005139 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C198327121 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2778750047 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2781289737 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2781354955 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W141256622 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C144024400 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C149923435 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C15744967 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C17744445 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C198327121 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C199539241 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2776640315 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2778642596 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2778750047 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2779076696 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2779234561 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2781289737 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2781354955 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2908647359 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C2986817661 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C518429986 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C54355233 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C71924100 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C77805123 @default.
• W141256622 hasConceptScore W141256622C86803240 @default.
• W141256622 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W141256622 hasLocation W1412566221 @default.
• W141256622 hasLocation W1412566222 @default.
• W141256622 hasOpenAccess W141256622 @default.
• W141256622 hasPrimaryLocation W1412566221 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W141256622 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2036565407 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2198047075 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2275919869 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2283966122 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2294550738 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W2294683021 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W3030563833 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W4311900585 @default.
• W141256622 hasRelatedWork W138673182 @default.
• W141256622 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W141256622 isParatext "false" @default.
• W141256622 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W141256622 magId "141256622" @default.
• W141256622 workType "article" @default.