FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1427355535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1427355535 endingPage "114" @default.
• W1427355535 startingPage "113" @default.
• W1427355535 abstract "We appreciate the comments of Dr Roger McMaster-Fay regarding pelvic congestion syndrome and immunohistochemistry to demonstrate endometriosis when histology is unremarkable. However, we do not believe that the issues raised cast doubt on the findings in our study. Furthermore, the comments of Dr McMaster-Fay illustrate a failure to recognize the challenges of gathering data from 52 hospitals ranging from large academic tertiary hospitals to small community hospitals.First, we do not consider pelvic congestion syndrome separately from chronic pelvic pain because there is ambiguity in the differential diagnosis. The surgical and imaging criteria to establish abnormal adnexal vascularity consistent with pelvic congestion are not well established. This leads to ambiguity for clinicians, and we could not expect clinicians across the collaborative spectrum to be consistent in differentiating the 2 conditions.Second, immunohistochemistry protocols for negative histology were neither included within our 52 hospital collaborative nor are they a feasible goal for the future. Techniques such as CD10 immunohistochemistry are not yet a routine part of analyzing specimens for endometriosis. It would not be possible to expect every hospital and every pathologist, regardless of bed size or affiliation, to explore these protocols to account for negative pathology.In summary, data from Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative are a reflection of clinical practice, not research-driven inquiry. There are limitations to the current knowledge and to standard techniques. Nonetheless, we believe that our study identifies areas of clinical practice worthy of attention for quality improvement. We appreciate the comments of Dr Roger McMaster-Fay regarding pelvic congestion syndrome and immunohistochemistry to demonstrate endometriosis when histology is unremarkable. However, we do not believe that the issues raised cast doubt on the findings in our study. Furthermore, the comments of Dr McMaster-Fay illustrate a failure to recognize the challenges of gathering data from 52 hospitals ranging from large academic tertiary hospitals to small community hospitals. First, we do not consider pelvic congestion syndrome separately from chronic pelvic pain because there is ambiguity in the differential diagnosis. The surgical and imaging criteria to establish abnormal adnexal vascularity consistent with pelvic congestion are not well established. This leads to ambiguity for clinicians, and we could not expect clinicians across the collaborative spectrum to be consistent in differentiating the 2 conditions. Second, immunohistochemistry protocols for negative histology were neither included within our 52 hospital collaborative nor are they a feasible goal for the future. Techniques such as CD10 immunohistochemistry are not yet a routine part of analyzing specimens for endometriosis. It would not be possible to expect every hospital and every pathologist, regardless of bed size or affiliation, to explore these protocols to account for negative pathology. In summary, data from Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative are a reflection of clinical practice, not research-driven inquiry. There are limitations to the current knowledge and to standard techniques. Nonetheless, we believe that our study identifies areas of clinical practice worthy of attention for quality improvement. Use of other treatment before hysterectomy for benign conditions: what about PCS and CD10?American Journal of Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 213Issue 1PreviewCorona et al,1 in a large retrospective review of the histopathological findings after hysterectomy found that the frequency of unsupportive pathology was higher in women aged younger than 40 years and highest among women with endometriosis or chronic pain. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W1427355535 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1427355535 creator A5018283767 @default.
• W1427355535 creator A5027012140 @default.
• W1427355535 creator A5031134013 @default.
• W1427355535 date "2015-07-01" @default.
• W1427355535 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1427355535 title "Reply" @default.
• W1427355535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.018" @default.
• W1427355535 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25935782" @default.
• W1427355535 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1427355535 type Work @default.
• W1427355535 sameAs 1427355535 @default.
• W1427355535 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1427355535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1427355535 hasAuthorship W1427355535A5018283767 @default.
• W1427355535 hasAuthorship W1427355535A5027012140 @default.
• W1427355535 hasAuthorship W1427355535A5031134013 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C178596483 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C2779522080 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C2780136519 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C2780801072 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C126838900 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C142724271 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C178596483 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C19527891 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C2779522080 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C2780136519 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C2780801072 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C61434518 @default.
• W1427355535 hasConceptScore W1427355535C71924100 @default.
• W1427355535 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1427355535 hasLocation W14273555351 @default.
• W1427355535 hasLocation W14273555352 @default.
• W1427355535 hasOpenAccess W1427355535 @default.
• W1427355535 hasPrimaryLocation W14273555351 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W1538742207 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2029564460 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2313689898 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2416993403 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2611485430 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2754531683 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W2982307992 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W4206311481 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W4309880452 @default.
• W1427355535 hasRelatedWork W4328102500 @default.
• W1427355535 hasVolume "213" @default.
• W1427355535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1427355535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1427355535 magId "1427355535" @default.
• W1427355535 workType "article" @default.