FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W142874429> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W142874429 abstract "This two-year case study investigated the effects of a peer observation process in a high school on the six selected areas listed below. Peer observation is a process to improve instruction by having teachers observe and critique other teacher's videotapes of classroom teaching. 1. Changes in norms and expectations for sharing instructional ideas among teachers. 2. The perceived value of self-evaluation of videotapes and related peer discussions about teaching. 3. The perceived value of peer feedback exchanges for instructional improvement. 4. The use of other teachers as models for effective teaching. 5. The perceived value of peer exchanges in stimulating a desire to improve. 6. The effect of peer interaction on the school climate for teacher improvement. The case study design was effective for investigating subjects in their natural setting which was a faculty of approximately 65 veteran teachers who had participated in one or more activities of the peer observation process. Research methods included the use of multiple sources of data from observations, questionnaires, surveys, peer discussion reports, and interviews. Lines of inquiry were triangulated across methods to strengthen the results and to search for divergent findings. Descriptive analyses were used to present and discuss the findings. Seventy-three percent of the staff participated the first year, 43% participated in the second year. Results from the findings indicated that peer observation had the following effects in this setting: 1. Standards of behavior among teachers changed from closed to open after experience with the process. Teachers exchanged ideas on teaching beyond that requested and in situations outside the process activities. 2. Videotape replay of classroom teaching and peer group discussions were perceived as valuable for both observed and observing teachers. 3. Teachers preferred feedback from peers because of the varied ideas from credible sources, the time to exchange teaching strategies, and the nonthreatening environment. 4. Teachers used other teachers as models for generating effective methods for immediate classroom use. S. Teachers perceived exchanges to have stimulated a desire to improve on three levels; awareness, effort, and implementation. 6. A climate for instructional improvement evolved where teachers perceived a need to share information and generate ideas in a non-threatening manner. The peer observation process was found to be an effective program for teacher improvement of instruction in this setting." @default.
• W142874429 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W142874429 creator A5047690178 @default.
• W142874429 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W142874429 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W142874429 title "A Case Study of Instructional Improvement through Peer Observation in a Suburban High School" @default.
• W142874429 doi "https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1251" @default.
• W142874429 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W142874429 type Work @default.
• W142874429 sameAs 142874429 @default.
• W142874429 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W142874429 crossrefType "report" @default.
• W142874429 hasAuthorship W142874429A5047690178 @default.
• W142874429 hasBestOaLocation W1428744291 @default.
• W142874429 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W142874429 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W142874429 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W142874429 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W142874429 hasConceptScore W142874429C145420912 @default.
• W142874429 hasConceptScore W142874429C15744967 @default.
• W142874429 hasConceptScore W142874429C509550671 @default.
• W142874429 hasConceptScore W142874429C71924100 @default.
• W142874429 hasLocation W1428744291 @default.
• W142874429 hasOpenAccess W142874429 @default.
• W142874429 hasPrimaryLocation W1428744291 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W1013834430 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W1541581143 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W1581088509 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W1995219063 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2082163789 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2126600670 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2139398015 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W224667181 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2280852546 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2282633995 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2288024724 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2467746223 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2569697012 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2724180116 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W2730520696 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W297677746 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W3015604827 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W314099309 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W3170551841 @default.
• W142874429 hasRelatedWork W349502931 @default.
• W142874429 isParatext "false" @default.
• W142874429 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W142874429 magId "142874429" @default.
• W142874429 workType "report" @default.