FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W144416674> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W144416674 endingPage "322" @default.
• W144416674 startingPage "314" @default.
• W144416674 abstract "This study investigated the effect that varying degrees of faculty self-promotion had on 322 student evaluations. As high student evaluations are correlated with greater student learning, it is imperative that we assess how faculty's presentation style is perceived by students so as to enhance instruction and therefore student learning. Students read a biographical introduction to a speaker followed by a transcript of a lecture. A manipulation check revealed that only the boastful, individual self-promotion condition was perceived as significantly different from the other three self-promotion conditions, so the data were recoded according to what students perceived to be self-promotion. Subsequent analyses found that this perceived self-promotion leads to lower evaluations. Personality and competence attributions accounted for 67% of students' perceptions of faculty. keywords: student evaluations of teaching, student ratings of instruction, teacher effectiveness evaluation, teaching evaluations, self-promotion, self-presentation, impression management, faculty instructors ********** Impression management refers to ways in which people attempt to influence how others see them. The most prominent way, self-presentation, involves how people manipulate information about themselves in order to create and maintain a desired perception of themselves (Gardner & Martinko, 1988; Schneider, 1981; Turnley & Bolino, 2001). Although psychologists have studied self-presentation since the early 1960s, most of the recent research conducted in this area has focused on business settings, specifically addressing employment interviewing and hiring and performance evaluation (Howard & Ferris, 1996). To our knowledge, no research has addressed the effect of self-presentation in an educational setting. Jones and Pittman (1982) identified five strategies comprising self-presentation: ingratiation, intimidation, self-promotion, exemplification, and supplication. Ingratiation and self-promotion are the two most influential ones that have been researched (Ellis, West, Ryan, & DeShon, 2002; Stevens & Kristof, 1995). Ingratiation tactics are intended to evoke attributions of social attractiveness or likeability, while self-promotion tactics are intended to evoke competence attributions (Ellis et al., 2002). Very often many settings demand that individuals exhibit both social attractiveness and competence. The goal of self-promotion is to promote one's accomplishments, achievements, contributions, talents, and qualities so favorably that others will view the self-promoter as highly competent (Cialdini & de Nicholas, 1989; Giacalone & Rosenfeld, 2001; Godfrey, Jones, & Lord, 1986; Higgins & Judge, 2004; Orpen, 1996; Rudman, 1998; Stevens & Kristof, 1995). Self-promotion is greatest (and most useful) when the self-promoter is not well known or when the intended audience is not a highly informed audience (Cialdini & de Nicholas, 1989; Rudman, 1998). The data are mixed as to whether self-promotion leads to favorable or unfavorable outcomes. In organizational contexts, some studies have found that self-promotion leads to better interviewer evaluations (and thus increased hiring and promotion), possibly because these decisions tend to be based on perceived competence (Ellis et al., 2002; Gilmore & Ferris, 1989; Miller, Cooke, Tsang, & Morgan, 1992; Rudman, 1998; Stevens & Kristof, 1995). Despite perceived competence, however, self-promoters also come across as conceited, self-serving, and showing off, leading others to dislike him/her (Giacalone & Rosenfeld, 2001; Gilmore & Ferris, 1989; Miller et al., 1992; Orpen, 1996; Turnley & Bolino, 2001). In these cases, perceived modesty is more important than perceived competence (Carlston & Shovar, 1983). The mixed data are particularly relevant with respect to women. In order for women to compete effectively with men they need to come across as competent. …" @default.
• W144416674 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W144416674 creator A5053000492 @default.
• W144416674 creator A5057845076 @default.
• W144416674 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W144416674 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W144416674 title "The Effect of Faculty Self-Promotion on Student Evaluations of Teaching" @default.
• W144416674 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W144416674 type Work @default.
• W144416674 sameAs 144416674 @default.
• W144416674 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W144416674 countsByYear W1444166742015 @default.
• W144416674 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W144416674 hasAuthorship W144416674A5053000492 @default.
• W144416674 hasAuthorship W144416674A5057845076 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C143299363 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C24845683 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C4994750 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W144416674 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C100521375 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C126838900 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C143299363 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C15744967 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C169760540 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C17744445 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C187288502 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C19417346 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C199539241 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C24845683 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C26760741 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C2777601897 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C4994750 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C509550671 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C71924100 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C77805123 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C94625758 @default.
• W144416674 hasConceptScore W144416674C98147612 @default.
• W144416674 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W144416674 hasLocation W1444166741 @default.
• W144416674 hasOpenAccess W144416674 @default.
• W144416674 hasPrimaryLocation W1444166741 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W141757590 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W1584649334 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W1926557966 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W1997863780 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2043447852 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2127256818 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2167789633 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2186303812 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2373368181 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2407758536 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2592160438 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2592322834 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2622372471 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2970806085 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W3125803946 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W44268274 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W57458265 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W8306528 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2182627536 @default.
• W144416674 hasRelatedWork W2605726640 @default.
• W144416674 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W144416674 isParatext "false" @default.
• W144416674 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W144416674 magId "144416674" @default.
• W144416674 workType "article" @default.