FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W144699844> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W144699844 startingPage "628" @default.
• W144699844 abstract "When Mr. Trocco helps his students study fringe topics using a traditional academic approach, he sees them become sophisticated, interdisciplinary thinkers. IT IS tough to persuade undergraduates to delve deeply into their research topics. In the science and health courses that I teach, I can only marvel at how many superficial papers I have read that take the form of the dreadful 'reports' that I remember writing in high school. Asking students to think critically and to interact fully with the complexities of a topic can be a thankless endeavor. However, their failure to engage with a topic seems often to be a result of their failure to understand the character of the research process itself. Once students have read all the suggested sources and the texts they have turned up through their own library searches, they seem to feel compelled to regurgitate all the material they have uncovered. They describe in detail what the experts think and explain the established hypotheses. The task of providing factual and descriptive background information overwhelms any original ' or even interesting ' thinking that might have emerged. The finished paper becomes a well-documented compilation of the ideas of others. For some years now I have experimented with a solution to this problem that helps student researchers engage with their topics and integrate their own individual meaning into their work. I encourage students to study weird things.1 By weird things I mean the unconventional and fringe areas of interest that often loosely fall under the headings of science and health and about which expert opinion is skeptical or at least still in flux ' e.g., extrasensory perception, homeopathy, crystal healing, facilitated communication, the Mozart Effect, aromatherapy, or ufology. Because they are beyond the edges of generally accepted knowledge, such topics offer ideal terrain for students to explore. Students can try out their academic skills as they begin to examine the scientific, methodological, cultural, and controversial components of the material. The study of weird topics encourages students to go beyond the simple rehash of facts and descriptions that makes the standard 'report' approach so stultifying. When students study fringe topics, they have to weigh evidence against testimony and claims against facts, and these responsibilities immediately draw them deeper into their work. Indeed, the reason they must approach these topics differently is embedded in the weird subject itself. As they examine areas that, though intriguing, are often deemed illegitimate from the viewpoint of orthodox science and Euro American analysis, students find that their work becomes a part of their own search for truth and for the boundaries of knowledge. For example, students studying creation science must grapple with the complexities of the scientific process, with negotiations over the validity of evidence, with the varying quality of expert opinion, with the historical contest between religion and science, and with the social nature of the construction of scientific knowledge. In short, they become sophisticated, interdisciplinary thinkers working at the interface between science and culture. What I've found is just the opposite of Philip Kitcher's assertion that 'it is educationally irresponsible to pretend that an idea that is scientifically worthless deserves scientific discussion.'2 At this point, I must add that many students today do not need to be encouraged to study weird topics. Indeed, for this reason, some readers might find my approach misguided. But I believe we can ride this wave of New-Agey enthusiasm and help students transform their thinking processes (and so their research reports) into an academically responsible approach to understanding the world. At the same time, students learn more than I could ever teach them directly about the scientific method, critical analysis, competent research, and, most important, original thinking. …" @default.
• W144699844 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W144699844 creator A5076581850 @default.
• W144699844 date "2000-04-01" @default.
• W144699844 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W144699844 title "Encouraging Students to Study Weird Things." @default.
• W144699844 cites W1527175142 @default.
• W144699844 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W144699844 type Work @default.
• W144699844 sameAs 144699844 @default.
• W144699844 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W144699844 countsByYear W1446998442013 @default.
• W144699844 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W144699844 hasAuthorship W144699844A5076581850 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W144699844 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C111472728 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C138885662 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C145420912 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C15744967 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C162324750 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C187736073 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C2780451532 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C2780876879 @default.
• W144699844 hasConceptScore W144699844C542102704 @default.
• W144699844 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W144699844 hasLocation W1446998441 @default.
• W144699844 hasOpenAccess W144699844 @default.
• W144699844 hasPrimaryLocation W1446998441 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W136857798 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W1543016597 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W1580635756 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W1591958304 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W190710079 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2109588831 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2184021090 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2238757225 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2264047454 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2342519344 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W248303148 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2608366603 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2980401811 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2992878047 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W3122159885 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W318984483 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W350477238 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W36091177 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W5269205 @default.
• W144699844 hasRelatedWork W2617616847 @default.
• W144699844 hasVolume "81" @default.
• W144699844 isParatext "false" @default.
• W144699844 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W144699844 magId "144699844" @default.
• W144699844 workType "article" @default.