FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1448308503> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1448308503 abstract "In the last 10 years there has been a proliferation of weed risk assessment (WRA) systems developed in response to a need to make informed judgments on where to spend finite resources on weed control or eradication. Each WRA system varies in the type of input information required, and although there are common elements across all systems, there has not been a study to compare the outputs from each system. The early results presented here are part of a larger study that compares assessments of a common set of species with five different WRA systems, to determine if the assessment of weed risk to natural ecosystems in Australia is consistent between States. The results will also inform policy makers on the most suitable system for Western Australia (WA). Four of the systems are post-border models, and the fifth is a pre-border model used by Biosecurity Australia to predict weed potential (results not shown). The WA system included in this study is not being applied at the state level, but is being used by some regional and local groups to rank weed species. Species selected for assessment include those with a range of growth habits, life form (annual or perennial) and estimated weediness. Ten species were ranked from one to 10 based on the scores for two criteria of a WRA, invasiveness and impacts, and correlation coefficients (Rs) determined. The early assessment results of 10 species show correlations between systems vary for the two criteria. The outcome of invasiveness assessments shows weak non-significant positive correlations between all systems, with the exception of SA and NT, which are significantly positively correlated (Rs = 0.839) (Table 1). This is to be expected, as the NT system is a derivative of the SA system. However, for the assessment of impacts, correlations between all systems are strongly positive and significant, with only the SA and WA systems showing a coefficient of less than 0.8. It is interesting that for the invasiveness criterion there was a lack of consistency across systems. Which WRA works for Western Australia? A comparison of weed risk assessment systems available in Australia using species of varying growth habit, life form and weediness" @default.
• W1448308503 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1448308503 creator A5008560247 @default.
• W1448308503 creator A5070715915 @default.
• W1448308503 creator A5091825379 @default.
• W1448308503 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W1448308503 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1448308503 title "Which WRA works for Western Australia? A comparison of weed risk assessment systems available in Australia using species of varying growth habit, life form and weediness." @default.
• W1448308503 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1448308503 type Work @default.
• W1448308503 sameAs 1448308503 @default.
• W1448308503 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1448308503 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1448308503 hasAuthorship W1448308503A5008560247 @default.
• W1448308503 hasAuthorship W1448308503A5070715915 @default.
• W1448308503 hasAuthorship W1448308503A5091825379 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C147273371 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C2775891814 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C2781368420 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C44670240 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C12174686 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C147273371 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C15744967 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C18903297 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C205649164 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C2775891814 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C2781368420 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C38652104 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C41008148 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C44670240 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C542102704 @default.
• W1448308503 hasConceptScore W1448308503C86803240 @default.
• W1448308503 hasLocation W14483085031 @default.
• W1448308503 hasOpenAccess W1448308503 @default.
• W1448308503 hasPrimaryLocation W14483085031 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W1504368180 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W1800436514 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W1823964252 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2054772009 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2082617027 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2111772054 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2117219309 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2192322348 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2277780424 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W243135177 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2474893628 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2788569378 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W2982687637 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W3113264105 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W316760997 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W319375691 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W325569313 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W331917619 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W337953882 @default.
• W1448308503 hasRelatedWork W614055893 @default.
• W1448308503 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1448308503 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1448308503 magId "1448308503" @default.
• W1448308503 workType "article" @default.