FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W144987013> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W144987013 abstract "This article examines the changing landscape for wiretaps and other electronic surveillance at the state level in the wake of the events of September 11. Based on available statistics, over two-thirds of law enforcement wiretaps in the United States in 2001 were authorized by state rather than federal judges, and there is evidence of significant under-reporting of state wiretaps. Part I of the Article explains the constitutional and statutory framework for government interception of: the content of a communication (wiretaps); to/from information (such as phone numbers or e-mail addresses); and stored communications records. Appendix A to the Article provides a survey and analysis of the interception, to/from, and stored records laws for all 50 states. Appendix B provides a survey of proposed and enacted changes to state laws in the initial period from September 11, 2001 to June 1, 2002. This research was performed on behalf of the Liberty and Security Initiative of the Constitution Project. Part II analyzes the proposed and enacted changes following September 11. Legislation principally addressed these issues: expanding the list of offenses eligible for interception orders; expanding the list of officials with wiretap authority; expanding the categories of persons who may execute wiretaps; authorizing roving and statewide surveillance; and expanding the types of communications and devices subject to interception. The conclusions in Part III highlight the weaker internal and external controls that apply to wiretaps and other electronic surveillance at the state level. At a formal/legal level, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) does provide that state wiretap laws may have effect only if they meet federal minimum standards for nature of the offense, minimization, and other features. Based on our review of state laws, however, we consider it likely that state wiretaps are systematically less subject to training requirements and other institutional controls on prosecutorial and police discretion. External controls are also likely more substantial at the federal level. Academics, the press, advocacy groups, and Congressional oversight have all provided important checks on any temptation by federal officials to overstep the limits of their surveillance powers. These oversight efforts are less developed in most states, and our research on state laws is intended in part to facilitate better understanding of how these laws in fact operate. A separate implication of this research concerns the interplay of federal and state surveillance law. Passage of the USA-PATRIOT Act in 2001 focused essentially exclusively on the scope of surveillance powers appropriate for federal officials. The preemption provision in ECPA, however, means that a change in federal law also permits an equivalent change in state law. Many of the bills recently proposed mirror the reduction of privacy rights in the USA-PATRIOT Act. In considering changes to federal surveillance law, the relatively weak internal and external oversight of state wiretaps is thus relevant. Even where sufficient controls can be created to justify actions by federal officials, the additional issue is whether appropriate safeguards will be created at the state level, where the large majority of wiretaps actually occur." @default.
• W144987013 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W144987013 creator A5016372635 @default.
• W144987013 creator A5056972439 @default.
• W144987013 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W144987013 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W144987013 title "State Wiretaps and Electronic Surveillance After September 11" @default.
• W144987013 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.416586" @default.
• W144987013 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W144987013 type Work @default.
• W144987013 sameAs 144987013 @default.
• W144987013 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W144987013 countsByYear W1449870132014 @default.
• W144987013 countsByYear W1449870132015 @default.
• W144987013 countsByYear W1449870132017 @default.
• W144987013 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W144987013 hasAuthorship W144987013A5016372635 @default.
• W144987013 hasAuthorship W144987013A5056972439 @default.
• W144987013 hasBestOaLocation W1449870132 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C2909731529 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W144987013 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C11413529 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C138885662 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C158129432 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C17744445 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C199539241 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2776154427 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2777351106 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2778137410 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2778707766 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2780262971 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C2909731529 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C3116431 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C38652104 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C41008148 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C41895202 @default.
• W144987013 hasConceptScore W144987013C48103436 @default.
• W144987013 hasLocation W1449870131 @default.
• W144987013 hasLocation W1449870132 @default.
• W144987013 hasOpenAccess W144987013 @default.
• W144987013 hasPrimaryLocation W1449870131 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W1509401556 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W1522143762 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W1585958049 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W1588437906 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W1988672683 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W203744000 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2269004156 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2286290978 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2301278157 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2480044048 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2586375835 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2746463078 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2806693576 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2911748317 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W2913490993 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W3121385248 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W3122616911 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W3125264179 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W3125273803 @default.
• W144987013 hasRelatedWork W34686692 @default.
• W144987013 isParatext "false" @default.
• W144987013 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W144987013 magId "144987013" @default.
• W144987013 workType "article" @default.