FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1458265073> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1458265073 endingPage "3924" @default.
• W1458265073 startingPage "3918" @default.
• W1458265073 abstract "Background Glenoid component loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty is one of the most common causes of failure. A hybrid glenoid that uses peripherally cemented pegs and a central press-fit post may improve implant longevity. Questions/purposes We asked, compared with polyethylene pegged glenoid implants, do hybrid glenoid implants with a titanium post provide (1) better ingrowth with fewer radiolucencies, (2) better outcome and pain scores, and (3) lower risk of complications and revisions? Methods Between 2009 and 2010, 126 patients underwent primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Patients were included in this retrospective study if they consented for inclusion in a shoulder arthroplasty registry, had complete baseline and 2-year data, and had complete radiographs. Eighty-three (67%) were available at an average followup of 3.2 years (range, 24-45 months). Forty received a conventional all-polyethylene pegged glenoid and 43 received a hybrid component. During the period in question, four of the participating surgeons used only one implant, and four used only the other; there was one high-volume surgeon in each of the study groups. Radiographs were taken at the 2-year followup and analyzed for radiolucent lines. CT scans were obtained randomly for 10 patients with hybrid glenoid implants to assess bone ongrowth. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, VAS score, complications and revisions were recorded. Results At final followup, radiolucent lines between the two study groups were not different (hybrid, 1.0 ± 0.4; pegged, 1.6 ± 0.3; mean difference, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.85-1.72; p = 0.323). Final VAS pain scores were not different (hybrid, 1.2 ± 0.2; pegged, 1.5 ± 0.3; p = 0.056). Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were not different (hybrid, 33.7 ± 7.3; pegged, 35.5 ± 8.2; p = 0.283). There were no differences in complication risk (hybrid, one of 43 [2.3%]; pegged, three of 40 [7.5%]; relative risk, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.82-3.12; p = 0.061). Conclusions With the numbers available and at early followup, there were no differences between the hybrid and pegged glenoids in terms of fixation, functional outcome, pain scores, and complications. CT scans confirmed bone ongrowth on the porous titanium post in a small subcohort of patients. Further studies are needed to determine how this new implant will perform with time. Until then, its use should be initiated with caution. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study." @default.
• W1458265073 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1458265073 creator A5010416890 @default.
• W1458265073 creator A5011152976 @default.
• W1458265073 creator A5057438995 @default.
• W1458265073 creator A5071072942 @default.
• W1458265073 creator A5071104926 @default.
• W1458265073 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W1458265073 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1458265073 title "No Differences in Early Results of a Hybrid Glenoid Compared With a Pegged Implant" @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1536810745 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1552728773 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1871984528 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1928460134 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1963703093 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1966012042 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1981445518 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W1995038985 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2000836479 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2014482955 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2019786500 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2043126374 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2049303605 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2062787235 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2066980640 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2070018814 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2080394514 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2085806101 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2090353462 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2104487263 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2124576724 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2124788360 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2129040608 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2130122050 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2152444150 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2157194089 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2163702344 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2165923402 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2171027187 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2179226499 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2182977466 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W2209637446 @default.
• W1458265073 cites W52992387 @default.
• W1458265073 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4558-5" @default.
• W1458265073 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4626480" @default.
• W1458265073 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26354176" @default.
• W1458265073 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1458265073 type Work @default.
• W1458265073 sameAs 1458265073 @default.
• W1458265073 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732016 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732017 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732019 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732020 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732021 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732022 @default.
• W1458265073 countsByYear W14582650732023 @default.
• W1458265073 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1458265073 hasAuthorship W1458265073A5010416890 @default.
• W1458265073 hasAuthorship W1458265073A5011152976 @default.
• W1458265073 hasAuthorship W1458265073A5057438995 @default.
• W1458265073 hasAuthorship W1458265073A5071072942 @default.
• W1458265073 hasAuthorship W1458265073A5071104926 @default.
• W1458265073 hasBestOaLocation W14582650732 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C2779777117 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C2780677649 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C63565114 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C141071460 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C142724271 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C167135981 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C199343813 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C204787440 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C2776164576 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C2778336525 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C2779777117 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C2780677649 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C2781411149 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C29694066 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C36454342 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C63565114 @default.
• W1458265073 hasConceptScore W1458265073C71924100 @default.
• W1458265073 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W1458265073 hasLocation W14582650731 @default.
• W1458265073 hasLocation W14582650732 @default.
• W1458265073 hasLocation W14582650733 @default.
• W1458265073 hasLocation W14582650734 @default.
• W1458265073 hasOpenAccess W1458265073 @default.

• next