FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1479861107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1479861107 endingPage "545" @default.
• W1479861107 startingPage "542" @default.
• W1479861107 abstract "Use of non-invasive cardiac imaging is recommended in numerous clinical scenarios in order to provide diagnostic and prognostic information to guide clinical decision making. Stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is well validated and has proven value in identifying patients at high risk of a serious cardiac event, whereas a normal MPI study confers a benign prognosis with a low annual serious cardiac event rate of 0.6% per year. However, there has always been concern that MPI can miss high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) as in patients with balanced ischemia due to flow-limiting three-vessel CAD or left main stenosis, while this group is particularly prone to adverse cardiac events and may have benefit of revascularization. In the current issue of the journal, Nakanishi et al studied the prevalence and predictors of high-risk CAD in patients with normal MPI. Subsequent invasive coronary angiography was performed within 60 days after normal MPI in 580 patients in two centers. High-risk CAD was defined as 3 vessels with C70% stenosis, 2 vessels with C70% stenosis including proximal left anterior descending, or left main with C50% stenosis. Overall, 36% in this highly selected group of patients had evidence of anatomically obstructive CAD, with high-risk CAD in 7.2% of all patients. Predictors for high-risk CAD were the presence of mild/equivocal perfusion defects, transient ischemic left ventricle dilatation or abnormal ejection fraction, and a pre-test probability ofC66%. AlthoughMPI can miss both high-risk CAD and stenoses in small coronary arteries, the charm of the paper by Nakanishi et al is that they focused on high-risk CAD.Although their number of false-negative MPI with 7.2% of patients high-risk CAD is impressive, it should be realized that these 42 patients are selected from a total of 25,698 patients with normal MPI (0.16%). Moreover, since the angiographic presence of high-risk CAD in their study was not proven by fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements, probably a substantial part of these stenoses was functionally not significant. Several previous studies suggested that MPI may underestimate high-risk CAD in selected patients. Berman et al demonstrated in 101 patients with proven left main stenosis (by invasive angiography) that 13% had normal perfusion by visual analysis. Lima et al demonstrated similar findings for 143 patients with severe threevessel CAD, in which one-fifth had normal MPI results. There are several potential reasons for SPECT-MPI missing high-risk CAD. Visual analysis of MPI images provides information on relative rather than absolute perfusion for each myocardial region. Therefore, global but uniform reduction in coronary vasodilator reserve may result in a homogeneous decreased distribution of radiotracer, potentially leading to false-negative MPI results. Several other reasons for false-negative MPI findings include insufficient coronary vasodilatation due to unrecognized ingestion of caffeine-containing products, attenuation and motion artifacts and plateauing of myocardial tracer uptake at high flow rates. Finally, a false-negative MPI may be in fact not false negative, since invasive angiography, without functional measurement of the stenosis, may overestimate the functional severity." @default.
• W1479861107 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1479861107 creator A5031494854 @default.
• W1479861107 creator A5052518157 @default.
• W1479861107 creator A5091767984 @default.
• W1479861107 date "2015-05-21" @default.
• W1479861107 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1479861107 title "High-risk coronary artery disease, but normal myocardial perfusion: A matter of concern?" @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1484080302 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W179485511 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1894272351 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1936833235 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1967777898 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1971293178 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1978668608 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1979262551 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1986107962 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W1995634969 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2013755752 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2014983118 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2016902413 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2030236567 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2053759425 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2056045910 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2067349076 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2075634649 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2087282394 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2088107685 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2107855607 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2110170849 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2115972527 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2142935346 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W216388883 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2165548906 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2170493603 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2186716495 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2415325417 @default.
• W1479861107 cites W2625644546 @default.
• W1479861107 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0167-7" @default.
• W1479861107 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25995183" @default.
• W1479861107 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1479861107 type Work @default.
• W1479861107 sameAs 1479861107 @default.
• W1479861107 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072016 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072017 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072018 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072019 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072020 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072021 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072022 @default.
• W1479861107 countsByYear W14798611072023 @default.
• W1479861107 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1479861107 hasAuthorship W1479861107A5031494854 @default.
• W1479861107 hasAuthorship W1479861107A5052518157 @default.
• W1479861107 hasAuthorship W1479861107A5091767984 @default.
• W1479861107 hasBestOaLocation W14798611071 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C135691158 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C2778405248 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C126322002 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C135691158 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C146957229 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C164705383 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C2778213512 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C2778405248 @default.
• W1479861107 hasConceptScore W1479861107C71924100 @default.
• W1479861107 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1479861107 hasLocation W14798611071 @default.
• W1479861107 hasLocation W14798611072 @default.
• W1479861107 hasOpenAccess W1479861107 @default.
• W1479861107 hasPrimaryLocation W14798611071 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2084118786 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2118222959 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2143000335 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2145902235 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2148491099 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2355538529 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2418045563 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W2760203899 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W3030427253 @default.
• W1479861107 hasRelatedWork W3032444586 @default.
• W1479861107 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W1479861107 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1479861107 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1479861107 magId "1479861107" @default.
• W1479861107 workType "article" @default.