FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1483809062> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1483809062 startingPage "51" @default.
• W1483809062 abstract "ABSTRACT Our study of 120 partners in dual-earner relationships (sixty couples with data collected from both partners) examined the impact of two independent variables - differentials in support and magnitude of support provision - on quality of life and marital conflict. We also investigated the role of individuals' normative beliefs about career priorities in dual-earner relationships on the support [arrow right] well being relationship. Our results supported our hypotheses that the magnitude of tangible and emotional support provision would be negatively related to marital conflict and positively related to quality of life. We also found that emotional support differentials related to elevated marital conflict, and that tangible support differentials contributed to decreased life quality. Finally, our data indicated that normative beliefs about career priorities moderated relationships between tangible support differentials and marital conflict, and magnitude of emotional support and quality of life. Key words: Normative beliefs, partner support differentials, career priority, marital conflict, quality of life. INTRODUCTION The burgeoning number of dual-earner couples in the workforce (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006) today has changed organizational and family life (Archer & Llyod, 2002; Bond, Thompson, Galinsky & Prottas, 2002) resulting in increasing research attention on the dynamics of dual-earner relationships (Byron, 2005; Litzky, Becker & Parasuraman, 1 998; Purohit, 2000) especially in terms of partner support (Livingston & Judge, 2008; Neff & Karney, 2005; Walen & Lachman, 2000). Partner support has been examined as a resource assisting individuals in dealing with intense, and often conflicting, work and non-work role demands (Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bordeaux & Brinley, 2005; Friedman & Greenhaus, 2000; Litzky, Purohit & Weer, 2008). The present study furthers partner support research by examining the impact of support provision differentials and magnitude on individuals' marital conflict and quality of life. This study also contributes to existing research by examining whether individuals' normative beliefs about the career priorities of dual-earner couples influence the relationship between partner support and well being. PARTNER SUPPORT IN DUAL-EARNER RELATIONSHIPS Researchers have examined different aspects of partner support including types of partner support (Bird & Schnurman-Cook, 2005; Parasuraman, Purohit, Godshalk & Beutell, 1996), functions of partner support (Carlson & Perrewe, 1999; Grzywacz & Marks, 2000), sources of support (Beauregard, 2007; Friedman & Greenhaus, 2000; Neff & Karney, 2005), and predictors of partner support (Litzky et al, 2008; Purohit, 2000). Despite what we know, research examining partner support has disproportionately focused on support receivers rather than on support providers (Eby et al., 2005; Granrose, Parasuraman & Greenhaus, 1992; Purohit, 2000). With a unidirectional focus on support recipients, we know almost nothing about support providers' support perceptions (Purohit, 2000; Shumaker & Brownell, 1984). A related research gap stems from the fact that in most partner support research data is typically collected from only one partner despite the fact that partner support is widely acknowledged as a dyadic exchange phenomenon (Crossfield, Kinman, & Jones, 2005; Eby et al, 2005; Granrose et al., 1992; Greenhaus & Parasuraman, 1994). Consequently, researchers have emphasized that to understand truly the interpersonal nature of partner support it is imperative for future research in this area to study both partners in the support process, and to assess support as a continuous exchange progression (Eby et al., 2005; Parasuraman & Greenhaus 1992, 1993; Purohit, 2000). Previous research also indicated that there are systematic differences in the magnitude and types of support partners provide and receive (Cinamon & Rich, 2002; Neff & Karney, 2005; Reevy & Maslach, 200 1). …" @default.
• W1483809062 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1483809062 creator A5008242620 @default.
• W1483809062 creator A5029264471 @default.
• W1483809062 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1483809062 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1483809062 title "THE IMPACT OF DUAL-EARNER COUPLES' BELIEFS ABOUT CAREER PRIORITY ON THE SUPPORT EXCHANGE [Arrow Right] WELL BEING RELATIONSHIP" @default.
• W1483809062 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1483809062 type Work @default.
• W1483809062 sameAs 1483809062 @default.
• W1483809062 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1483809062 countsByYear W14838090622012 @default.
• W1483809062 countsByYear W14838090622015 @default.
• W1483809062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1483809062 hasAuthorship W1483809062A5008242620 @default.
• W1483809062 hasAuthorship W1483809062A5029264471 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C2780980858 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C2781354955 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C111472728 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C124952713 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C138885662 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C142362112 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C144024400 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C149923435 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C15744967 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C17744445 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C199539241 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C2778139618 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C2779530757 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C2780980858 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C2781354955 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C2908647359 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C44725695 @default.
• W1483809062 hasConceptScore W1483809062C77805123 @default.
• W1483809062 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1483809062 hasLocation W14838090621 @default.
• W1483809062 hasOpenAccess W1483809062 @default.
• W1483809062 hasPrimaryLocation W14838090621 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W1537632033 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W1764094934 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W1895257220 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W1979968192 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2026451614 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W206807883 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2123989803 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2125939162 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2134264006 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2146701322 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2170379887 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2307527879 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2475174991 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2614927554 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2738297960 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2754932843 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2801082611 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W3154079237 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W76792671 @default.
• W1483809062 hasRelatedWork W2337035944 @default.
• W1483809062 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W1483809062 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1483809062 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1483809062 magId "1483809062" @default.
• W1483809062 workType "article" @default.