FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1483978772> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1483978772 endingPage "348" @default.
• W1483978772 startingPage "339" @default.
• W1483978772 abstract "Summary 1. Simple, conservation‐relevant, plant community measures are sought by resource managers. In this context, the use of Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) has increased exponentially over the past 30 years. FQA measures a habitat’s Floristic Quality and conservation value by summarizing the relative anthropogenic disturbance tolerances of its plant species (i.e. their Conservatism). However, despite their widespread use in research, restoration and conservation work, the behaviour of FQA values in communities during succession is not understood. 2. We analysed FQA values in 10 old fields over 50 years of unaltered succession. We determined whether Floristic Quality followed a predictable increasing successional trend, assessing four specific predictions: (i) FQA values will follow an asymptotically increasing, rather than peaked or linearly increasing trajectory; (ii) field initiation treatments (abandoned as hayfield or cropfield) will not lead to long‐term differences in FQA values; (iii) trajectories will be consistent regardless of the particular species composition of fields and (iv) trajectories will be robust to common variations in FQA metric formulations (non‐native species, varied spatial scale). 3. In all cases, a negative exponential rise to an asymptote best described FQA value trajectories over time. Field abandonment treatments did not affect FQA value trajectories. Furthermore, trends were consistent among fields despite differences in species composition among fields. Overall, the results suggest a predictable, deterministic path for FQA values over the early‐ to mid‐successional timeframes studied. 4. Synthesis and applications . Understanding the temporal behaviour(s) of Floristic Quality is necessary for setting realistic restoration goals, evaluating habitat recovery and adapting management to achieve high conservation value natural areas. By illustrating the temporal consistency of Floristic Quality metrics during succession, this article demonstrates the robustness of FQA for such uses. The FQA value trajectory described here also establishes a background trend model for expected values in recovering habitats, which will allow for the assessment of an individual habitat’s progression relative to the background trend. Such comparisons en masse will highlight the constraints of greatest importance to community‐level Floristic Quality restoration. For example, FQA values in this study were ultimately limited by Conservative understorey plant re‐establishment from adjacent old‐growth forest. As this is not unlike species recovery patterns observed in other habitats, it suggests that restoration practitioners would do well to focus on Conservative species." @default.
• W1483978772 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1483978772 creator A5028436309 @default.
• W1483978772 creator A5034309708 @default.
• W1483978772 creator A5069020040 @default.
• W1483978772 creator A5073733375 @default.
• W1483978772 date "2012-01-24" @default.
• W1483978772 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1483978772 title "Successional trends in Floristic Quality" @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1925585275 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1963860111 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1965396579 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1974550381 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1975704451 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1976975976 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1977121694 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1985764585 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1988618524 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1994664474 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W1995249485 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2007486529 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2010599217 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2012286713 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2022722434 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2029163996 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2040759332 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2041957317 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2043876844 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2045411870 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2052534867 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2054278885 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2060535392 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2062603909 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2064610079 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2076354480 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2080268573 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2081220355 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2089027540 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2090812249 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2099718218 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2100373577 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2112273903 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2124696785 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2125761151 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2127104872 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2127278770 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2128658604 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2129066707 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2130597685 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2131847921 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2138572131 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2145058108 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2147887903 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2154471588 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2162501238 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2176082011 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2176666877 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2224925247 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2325440084 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2332759234 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W2334251255 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W4242111431 @default.
• W1483978772 cites W4255258767 @default.
• W1483978772 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02100.x" @default.
• W1483978772 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1483978772 type Work @default.
• W1483978772 sameAs 1483978772 @default.
• W1483978772 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722013 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722015 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722016 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722017 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722018 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722019 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722020 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722022 @default.
• W1483978772 countsByYear W14839787722023 @default.
• W1483978772 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1483978772 hasAuthorship W1483978772A5028436309 @default.
• W1483978772 hasAuthorship W1483978772A5034309708 @default.
• W1483978772 hasAuthorship W1483978772A5069020040 @default.
• W1483978772 hasAuthorship W1483978772A5073733375 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C150117547 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C2777601987 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C150117547 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C151730666 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C166957645 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C185933670 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C18903297 @default.
• W1483978772 hasConceptScore W1483978772C205649164 @default.

• next