FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1489448218> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1489448218 endingPage "838" @default.
• W1489448218 startingPage "832" @default.
• W1489448218 abstract "All of the considerations which prompt an investigator to use a laboratory rather than a reallife situation in research on behavior apply with full force to the study of accidents. But laboratory research on risk-taking and accident-inducing behavior is beset by several limitations. First, the ethics of laboratory experimentation preclude the introduction of hazards that can produce the more serious injuries all too common in real life. Secondly, it is doubtful whether a laboratory can replicate (or even effectively simulate) the numerous and complexly interacting behavioral and environmental variables involved in even the simplest accident-whether it be a vehicle-pedestrian collision or the ingestion of a household chemical. As a result, every laboratory study of risk-taking must be subjected to two questions. First, is the subject behaving in the laboratory in much the same way as he behaves in the real world. This question, which is by no means peculiar to accident research, is asked in essentially quantitative terms: Is the subject as spontaneous? Is he more inhibited? The second question is essentially qualitative: Does the laboratory situation elicit the same kind of behavior that a real-life situation would elicit? Is the subject driving a simulator responding to the stimuli presented by a real automobile on a real highway? Is the laboratory task eliciting all the responses involved in risk-taking or does it require of the subject only an affectless calculation of subjective or objective probability? A review of the laboratory experimentation on risk-taking uncovers few studies indeed that provide defensible answers to these questions. It is for these reasons that the study of risk-taking behavior in a natural setting is crucially important. Yet the natural site, too, presents problems. Because accidents are infrequently occurring events, studying them in a natural environment is time-consuming, expensive, and often frustrating. To eliminate the possibility of observer effect, the investigator must remain concealed. And the question of ethics does not disappear. If the investigator observes an accident about to occur, does he welcome it because it provides data or does he break out of his role and try to prevent it? The paper that follows offers interesting solutions to several of the problems posed above. By using cinematography with a concealed camera, the investigators not only eliminated the problem of observer effect but also produced a permanent set of objective data that lent themselves to repeated and detailed analysis. Their choice of time and place maximized economy in data gathering. And their decision to study the near accident as well as the injury-producing accident substantially increased the proportion of relevant data. With respect to the study itself, however, some critical questions remain. Aside from economic considerations, was the site chosen for data-gathering the best possible one? Was the behavior of the subjects influenced by their proximity to the school, or by specific school instruction in street-crossing behavior? Would children in a playground or other non-school setting exhibit more spontaneous behavior? Moreover, broadening a study to include the near accident must be done only after very careful consideration. If this is done on the assumption that the near accident is sufficiently similar to the injury-producing accident to be treated in the same way, the investigator may neglect a careful examination of the differences between the two events; in these differences may lie clues as to effective countermeasures." @default.
• W1489448218 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1489448218 creator A5010063832 @default.
• W1489448218 creator A5088809604 @default.
• W1489448218 creator A5089841737 @default.
• W1489448218 date "1969-11-01" @default.
• W1489448218 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W1489448218 title "AN EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSIS OF CHILD PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOR" @default.
• W1489448218 doi "https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.44.5.832" @default.
• W1489448218 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5376926" @default.
• W1489448218 hasPublicationYear "1969" @default.
• W1489448218 type Work @default.
• W1489448218 sameAs 1489448218 @default.
• W1489448218 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W1489448218 countsByYear W14894482182018 @default.
• W1489448218 countsByYear W14894482182020 @default.
• W1489448218 countsByYear W14894482182021 @default.
• W1489448218 countsByYear W14894482182022 @default.
• W1489448218 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1489448218 hasAuthorship W1489448218A5010063832 @default.
• W1489448218 hasAuthorship W1489448218A5088809604 @default.
• W1489448218 hasAuthorship W1489448218A5089841737 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C22212356 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C2777113093 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C2780289543 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C2781162219 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C105795698 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C111472728 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C112930515 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C127413603 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C138885662 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C161191863 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C201995342 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C22212356 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C2777113093 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C2777855551 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C2780289543 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C2780451532 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C2781162219 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C3017944768 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C33923547 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C41008148 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C545542383 @default.
• W1489448218 hasConceptScore W1489448218C71924100 @default.
• W1489448218 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1489448218 hasLocation W14894482181 @default.
• W1489448218 hasLocation W14894482182 @default.
• W1489448218 hasOpenAccess W1489448218 @default.
• W1489448218 hasPrimaryLocation W14894482181 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W1836555331 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W198666999 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W2008439310 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W2039501641 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W2060467247 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W2141222622 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W3092223549 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W3118087828 @default.
• W1489448218 hasRelatedWork W3140628972 @default.
• W1489448218 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W1489448218 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1489448218 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1489448218 magId "1489448218" @default.
• W1489448218 workType "article" @default.