FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1489574993> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1489574993 endingPage "142" @default.
• W1489574993 startingPage "129" @default.
• W1489574993 abstract "In the traditional systems modeling approach, the modeler is required to capture a user's view of some domain in a formal conceptual schema. The designer's conceptualization may or may not match with the user's conceptualization. One of the reasons for these conflicts is the lack of an initial agreement among users and modelers concerning the concepts belonging to the domain. Such an agreement could be facilitated by means of an ontology. If the ontology is previously constructed and formalized so that it can be shared by the modeler and the user in the development process, such conflicts would be less likely to happen. Following up on that, a number of investigators have suggested that those working on information systems should make use of commonly held, formally defined ontologies that would constrain and direct the design, development, and use of information systems - thus avoiding the above mentioned difficulties. Whether ontologies represent a significant advance from the more traditional conceptual schemas has been challenged by some researchers. We review and summarize some major themes of this complex discussion. While recognizing the commonalities and historical continuities between conceptual schemas and ontologies, we think that there is an important emerging distinction that should not be obscured and should guide future developments. In particular, we propose that the notions of conceptual schemas and ontologies be distinguished so as to play essentially different roles for the developers and users of information systems. We first suggest that ontologies and conceptual schemas belong to two different epistemic levels. They have different objects and are created with different objectives. Our proposal is that ontologies should deal with general assumptions concerning the explanatory invariants of a domain - those that provide a framework enabling understanding and explanation of data across all domains inviting explanation and understanding. Conceptual schemas, on the other hand, should address the relation between such general explanatory categories and the facts that exemplify them in a particular domain (e.g., the contents of the database). In contrast to ontologies, conceptual schemas would involve specification of the meaning of the explanatory categories for a particular domain as well as the consequent dimensions of possible variation among the relevant data of a given domain. Accordingly, the conceptual schema makes possible both the intelligibility and the measurement of those facts of a particular domain. The proposed distinction between ontologies and conceptual schemas makes possible a natural decomposition of information systems in terms of two necessary but complementary epistemic functions: identification of an invariant background and measurement of the object along dimensions of possible variation. Recognition of the suggested distinction represents, we think, a natural evolution in the field of modeling, and significant principled guidance for developers and users of information systems." @default.
• W1489574993 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1489574993 creator A5023915899 @default.
• W1489574993 creator A5079750216 @default.
• W1489574993 date "2007-02-01" @default.
• W1489574993 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1489574993 title "Learning The Differences Between Ontologies and Conceptual Schemas Through Ontology-Driven Information Systems." @default.
• W1489574993 cites W12980045 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1504385997 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1511212461 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1516346799 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1517781095 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1536078838 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1544596248 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1561949898 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1581127248 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W163326580 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W172457936 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1840131842 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1865453863 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1967003875 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1993623056 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1998794227 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W1999162001 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2000870748 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2012656354 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2013729267 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2018978908 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2030836928 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2033024994 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2071816903 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2076005933 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2080186332 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2090154982 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2097961633 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2099293367 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2115121100 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2119969592 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2133109597 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2137079713 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2139212084 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2144192824 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2158606791 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2158623598 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2160632926 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2489280374 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W2952307276 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W3121164770 @default.
• W1489574993 cites W611618653 @default.
• W1489574993 doi "https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00114" @default.
• W1489574993 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1489574993 type Work @default.
• W1489574993 sameAs 1489574993 @default.
• W1489574993 citedByCount "60" @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932012 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932013 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932014 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932015 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932016 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932017 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932018 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932020 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932021 @default.
• W1489574993 countsByYear W14895749932022 @default.
• W1489574993 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1489574993 hasAuthorship W1489574993A5023915899 @default.
• W1489574993 hasAuthorship W1489574993A5079750216 @default.
• W1489574993 hasBestOaLocation W14895749931 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C118248724 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C13606891 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C137003198 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C14224292 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C154210476 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C165611974 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C25810664 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C29275276 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C36503486 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C52146309 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConcept C98893333 @default.
• W1489574993 hasConceptScore W1489574993C107993555 @default.

• next