FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W149004920> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W149004920 startingPage "90" @default.
• W149004920 abstract "The characteristics of positive and negative one-to-one student-faculty interactions were examined in a sample of college students with disabilities and without. Analyses indicated that those with disabilities responded similarly to those without with the exception that students with disabilities find interactions with faculty more pleasant than their non-disabled peers. Respondents also wrote themes characterizing their most positive and negative interactions. Themes that characterized positive interactions were similar for both groups. However, students with disabilities reported more themes where faculty were unaccommodating or sarcastic in their one-to-one interactions. The number of students with disabilities entering college has increased rapidly (Fichten, 1988). While the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 has made college campuses more accessible, students with disabilities still face numerous difficulties. One specific challenge pertains to how they are perceived and treated by faculty. Fichten, Goodrick, Tagalakis, Amsel, and Libman (1990) stated that a professor's awareness of the special needs of students with disabilities is vital to students' success. Winzer (1987) indicated that if instructors display negative attitudes toward students with disabilities, it can impede their academic performance. Hart and Williams (1995) reported that professors generally adopt one of four roles when teaching a student with a disability. Three of these, the nervous Avoider, the overprotective Guardian, or the discounting Rejector have extremely negative consequences. Only the fourth, the role of the supporting, encouraging Nurturer is seen as beneficial. Patton (1981) reported that though professors typically feel positively toward students with disabilities, most don't know how to help them. This may account for their adopting one of the stereotypical roles mentioned above. Not only do professors lack such knowledge, but they are also hesitant about seeking it; ironically, professors who initiated conversations about students' disabilities were considered outstanding by those students (see Amsel & Fichten, 1990). Many students are concerned about student-faculty interactions. However, by virtue of their special needs, interactions between students with disabilities and faculty take on special importance. Fitchen, Amsel, Bourdon, & Creti (1988) examined what disabled students and professors viewed as or inappropriate interactions between them. Of 196 behaviors studied, appropriate ones were judged more common than inappropriate. Fitchen et al. (1988) also state that professors are often exhorted to treat students with disabilities ... like other students, within their limitations, while disabled students are told: behave like other students wherever possible (p. 14). The current study examines these maxims by presenting data that compare disabled and non-disabled students' positive and negative interactions with professors. The One-to-one survey (Folse, Rosenthal, Boudreaux & Soper, 1994) was designed to investigate students' personal interactions with faculty outside the classroom. The survey included questionnaire and narrative items. The current study compares the responses of students with disabilities to those without. Research hypotheses consist of the following: (a) students with disabilities (SWD) and students without (SW) would differ in their tendencies to initiate one-to-one interactions. (b) SWD and SW would differ in their overall satisfaction with such interactions. (c) SWD and SW would differ in the extent to which positive and negative interactions affect their reports of course performance. (d) SWD and SW would differ to the extent which positive and negative interactions affect their student evaluations of the professor. (e) SWD and SW would differ in the percentage of twelve basic themes (typical of positive and negative interactions) present in their narratives. …" @default.
• W149004920 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W149004920 creator A5034138576 @default.
• W149004920 creator A5043110633 @default.
• W149004920 creator A5048502731 @default.
• W149004920 creator A5065895930 @default.
• W149004920 creator A5068950447 @default.
• W149004920 creator A5070850447 @default.
• W149004920 date "2000-06-01" @default.
• W149004920 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W149004920 title "The One-to-One Survey: Students with Disabilities versus Students without Disabilities Satisfaction with Professors during One-on-One Contacts" @default.
• W149004920 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W149004920 type Work @default.
• W149004920 sameAs 149004920 @default.
• W149004920 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W149004920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5034138576 @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5043110633 @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5048502731 @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5065895930 @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5068950447 @default.
• W149004920 hasAuthorship W149004920A5070850447 @default.
• W149004920 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W149004920 hasConcept C15107229 @default.
• W149004920 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W149004920 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W149004920 hasConceptScore W149004920C138496976 @default.
• W149004920 hasConceptScore W149004920C15107229 @default.
• W149004920 hasConceptScore W149004920C15744967 @default.
• W149004920 hasConceptScore W149004920C77805123 @default.
• W149004920 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W149004920 hasLocation W1490049201 @default.
• W149004920 hasOpenAccess W149004920 @default.
• W149004920 hasPrimaryLocation W1490049201 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W102218095 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W122783796 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W154495643 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W192942426 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W1990189359 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2029204275 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2048860439 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2054774950 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2083690502 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2154323750 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2294288070 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2496679327 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W279108895 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W291969826 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W299015692 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W71447708 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W751722976 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W80596862 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W160182354 @default.
• W149004920 hasRelatedWork W2265179964 @default.
• W149004920 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W149004920 isParatext "false" @default.
• W149004920 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W149004920 magId "149004920" @default.
• W149004920 workType "article" @default.