FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1490753527> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1490753527 endingPage "1005" @default.
• W1490753527 startingPage "995" @default.
• W1490753527 abstract "Standard neoclassical economic analysis is typically concerned with individual utility maximization. In this paper we shall consider a problem of constrained social welfare maximization. Our criterion of social welfare is and we shall discuss how this may be maximized by a move from an initial allocation to a final fairer allocation, subject to the constraint that no one be made worse off by the move. We think the goal of fairness maximization characterizes, albeit in a simplistic way, the goals pursued by enlightened governments in their redistributional policies. We shall also discuss a concept of complete fairness and illustrate some of its weaknesses. The fairness problem is ancient and dates back at least to classical Greece. It has been treated recently by mathematicians who typically are concerned with the existence of a of a nonuniform object among n persons; that is, a division with the property that each party thinks he is getting at least t/nth of the value of the object. (See, for example, Lester Dubins and Edwin Spanier, Harold Kuhn, and Hugo Steinhaus.) This is not the approach we will take, since we will assume a world of homogeneous infinitely divisible goods in which the mathematical fair division problem becomes trivial. The concept of fairness has also been treated extensively by philosophers. The most recent philosophical approach is that of John Rawls, who argues at length for a social contract theory of justice: a society which maximizes the welfare of its worst off members is most just and that is the sort of society people will, from an initial position of ignorance about their endowments and interests, contract to enter. Rawls' approach has been extended to a theory of taxation by Edmund Phelps. Again, Rawlsian fairness, or justice, is not the fairness we are interested in; we do not assume a precontractual state of ignorance, we do assume that knowledge of wealth and tastes is given. In fact, knowledge about one's own and others' bundles of goods is crucial in our discussion. What then is our notion of fairness? It is fairness in the sense of non-envy. A completely fair social state is one in which no citizen would prefer what another has to what he himself has; a relatively fair social state is one in which few citizens would prefer what others have to what they themselves have; a totally unfair state is one in which every citizen finds his position to be inferior to that of everyone else. This concept of fairness is appealing because it only depends, like other economic concepts, on individual tastes and endowments. Fairness in the non-envy sense has been discussed in several recent papers by economists. Serge Christophe Kolm considers allocative fairness, and shows that there exist allocations which are both completely fair and efficient.' David Schmeidler and Karl Vind define fair trades as" @default.
• W1490753527 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1490753527 creator A5038201216 @default.
• W1490753527 creator A5080079347 @default.
• W1490753527 date "1974-01-01" @default.
• W1490753527 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1490753527 title "Fairness and Envy" @default.
• W1490753527 cites W1975833254 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W1987635542 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W2016199854 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W2088498069 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W2117436633 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W2321656971 @default.
• W1490753527 cites W2331171996 @default.
• W1490753527 hasPublicationYear "1974" @default.
• W1490753527 type Work @default.
• W1490753527 sameAs 1490753527 @default.
• W1490753527 citedByCount "55" @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272012 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272013 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272014 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272015 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272016 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272020 @default.
• W1490753527 countsByYear W14907535272021 @default.
• W1490753527 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1490753527 hasAuthorship W1490753527A5038201216 @default.
• W1490753527 hasAuthorship W1490753527A5080079347 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C133425853 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C184659173 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C189352744 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2776036281 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2776330181 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C2781238097 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C536738050 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConcept C88548561 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C100243477 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C118084267 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C119857082 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C133425853 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C139621336 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C144237770 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C154945302 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C161191863 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C162324750 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C175444787 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C17744445 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C184659173 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C189352744 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C190253527 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C199539241 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C23123220 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2524010 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2776036281 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2776291640 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2776330181 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2777855551 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C2781238097 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C33923547 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C34447519 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C41008148 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C536738050 @default.
• W1490753527 hasConceptScore W1490753527C88548561 @default.
• W1490753527 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1490753527 hasLocation W14907535271 @default.
• W1490753527 hasOpenAccess W1490753527 @default.
• W1490753527 hasPrimaryLocation W14907535271 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1506092753 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1968114120 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1974210025 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1974754122 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1986778800 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1993091619 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1998225966 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1998695303 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W1999698704 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W2002800331 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W2005467652 @default.
• W1490753527 hasRelatedWork W2008287663 @default.

• next