FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1490953933> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1490953933 abstract "The purpose of this essay is to consider the question of whether faith integration in a legal education is worthwhile. A lawyer's work is essentially solving with a moral compass in a legal For many people in the United States and in Britain, a substantial part of a person's moral sense and thinking comes from religious teachings and traditions. At the University of St. Thomas School of Law, Catholic Social Teaching and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition offer an essential backdrop that provides a springboard for discussions about justice, fairness, tax law, and the state through the lens of a faith tradition. Other faith traditions and secular humanism are welcome perspectives. Discussing moral foundations as part of the legal system and as important in each field of law provides law students with the opportunity to improve and enhance their own moral reasoning.These discussions, if done well, should model civil discourse. The civility of the discourse promotes further discussion and, I maintain, enhances the growth of each student's moral compass. The evidence suggests that we are succeeding in encouraging moral reasoning through civil discourse. Data from the national Law School Survey of Student Engagement (2008) show that our law students at the University of St. Thomas, when compared to students from other law schools, reported remarkably higher ethical, moral, and spiritual development and a greater desire to contribute to the welfare of their communities. This self-assessment, especially when compared to thousands of law students from other American law schools, paints a pretty positive picture of our institutional success (333 St. Thomas respondents in a total survey pool of 28,889 from numerous institutions).Navigating through the cultural norm of keeping faith identity in the closet is probably the greatest impediment to the goal of helping law students to integrate their religious identities into their professional identities of being lawyers. Learning how to deal with religious differences, however, may actually be beneficial. Talking about religious differences enables us to practice tolerance. Tolerance enables us to have difficult conversations. These conversations may actually enable us to explore common ground. Listening replaces shouting. Discord is avoided. Problems may actually be addressed with possible solutions. Moral reasoning through civil discourse is a legitimate approach for many solving contexts. This style of reasoning takes us back to problem solving with a moral compass in a legal context." @default.
• W1490953933 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1490953933 creator A5078189551 @default.
• W1490953933 date "2009-03-03" @default.
• W1490953933 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1490953933 title "The Relevance of Faith Integration in Legal Education: An Essay" @default.
• W1490953933 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1490953933 type Work @default.
• W1490953933 sameAs 1490953933 @default.
• W1490953933 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1490953933 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1490953933 hasAuthorship W1490953933A5078189551 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C2778692574 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C2780015519 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C524211801 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C111472728 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C138885662 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C144024400 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C158154518 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C17744445 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C199539241 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C2778692574 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C2780015519 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C524211801 @default.
• W1490953933 hasConceptScore W1490953933C94625758 @default.
• W1490953933 hasLocation W14909539331 @default.
• W1490953933 hasOpenAccess W1490953933 @default.
• W1490953933 hasPrimaryLocation W14909539331 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2011162556 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2051805096 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2062037400 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2099961986 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2221427327 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2252496779 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2253349118 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2272088460 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2416606617 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2697170596 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2733357516 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2768983770 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2786795488 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2909162394 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W2994459422 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W3122099296 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W3123515269 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W3138823396 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W3153907879 @default.
• W1490953933 hasRelatedWork W52848500 @default.
• W1490953933 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1490953933 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1490953933 magId "1490953933" @default.
• W1490953933 workType "article" @default.