FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1495230417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1495230417 abstract "This study is aimed at identifying and describing the social factors andsocial dimensions employed by the characters in the film Freedom Writers. Theobjectives of this study are to identify and describe (1) the social factors of thecharacters’ language reflecting racism and (2) the social dimensions of thecharacters’ language reflecting racism.This research applied a qualitative method with the researcher as the maininstrument and the data sheets as the secondary instruments. The data of thisresearch were in the form of utterances employed by the characters in FreedomWriters. The data were collected by watching the film, checking the dialogues inthe script, and recording the racist utterances. Theory and researchertriangulations were applied to enhance the trustworthiness of the data.The findings show four kinds of social factors that are used in the filmFreedom Writers, i.e. participants, setting, topics, and functions of the interaction.The first is participants who involve racism issue in their daily conversation, i.e.family and school participants. The second is setting, which consists of public andprivate places in which the racism phenomena occur. The third, there are twomain topics which are talked by the characters, racial segregation and raceperspective. The utterances reflecting racism in Freedom Writers have threefunctions. Expressives which show the characters’ feelings about racism,directive, and representative, which is to provide information from othersespecially about racism as a crucial issue in America. The second findings showthat there are four kinds of social dimensions in Freedom Writers, i.e. solidarityscale, status or power scale, formality scale, and functional scales. There are twotypes in each scale, high and low scales. Solidarity scales show the relationshipbetween the participants. Intimate speakers have a high solidarity, such as familyparticipants who have a higher solidarity scale than school participants. Statusscale shows the social role in the society. Superior speakers will have a higherstatus than others who are inferior. Formality scales show how the participantsspeak based on the social context and setting. High formality is used by speakerswhen they are talking in the formal places and occassions, i.e. in a classroom andteachers’ room. Low formality conversations occur in the informal settings andoccassions, such as in a bedroom, school yard, and restaurant. Functional scalespresent the functions of the racist utterances in two sub-categories, referential andaffective. Referential involves the utterances which express new information,while affective expresses the speakers’ feeling in the conversations about racismissue." @default.
• W1495230417 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1495230417 creator A5058224494 @default.
• W1495230417 creator A5068864829 @default.
• W1495230417 date "2012-07-31" @default.
• W1495230417 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1495230417 title "SOCIAL FACTORS AND SOCIAL DIMENSIONS IN THE LANGUAGE OF FREEDOM WRITERS’ CHARACTERS REFLECTING RACISM IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" @default.
• W1495230417 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1495230417 type Work @default.
• W1495230417 sameAs 1495230417 @default.
• W1495230417 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1495230417 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1495230417 hasAuthorship W1495230417A5058224494 @default.
• W1495230417 hasAuthorship W1495230417A5068864829 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C139838865 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C107993555 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C122980154 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C139838865 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C144024400 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C15744967 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C2777200299 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C46312422 @default.
• W1495230417 hasConceptScore W1495230417C77805123 @default.
• W1495230417 hasLocation W14952304171 @default.
• W1495230417 hasOpenAccess W1495230417 @default.
• W1495230417 hasPrimaryLocation W14952304171 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W125601054 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W1549240050 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W1586783265 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W1973347671 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2213594739 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2257061510 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2281926364 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2615709233 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2671024978 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2763436783 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2800592173 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W28127373 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2946835832 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2953087680 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W3006195997 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W3110187809 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W3165066420 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2217449374 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2528334140 @default.
• W1495230417 hasRelatedWork W2607840938 @default.
• W1495230417 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1495230417 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1495230417 magId "1495230417" @default.
• W1495230417 workType "dissertation" @default.