FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1496780706> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1496780706 endingPage "184" @default.
• W1496780706 startingPage "173" @default.
• W1496780706 abstract "1. INTRODUCTION Both undergraduate and graduate courses are experiencing a migration away from the traditional classroom and toward a greater emphasis for electronic delivery of content (Allen and Seaman, 2008). This trend cuts across all departments and schools in the university system but is especially critical in business schools, since the preparation of students for successful business careers will rely on the students' abilities to accurately assess the quality of and rapidly adapt to the changing systems that reflect radical technological advances. The Information Systems Success (ISS) model focuses attention on the information and system quality of specific IT systems. The expanded use of electronic means of course delivery results in different IT systems in which students develop various views of the system quality and information quality that may affect their educational outcomes. In a graduate online information management course, feedback provided in the e-learning environment affected student satisfaction, the typical outcome measure for the ISS model (Rossin, et al., 2008). Feedback, in the context of an e-learning environment, is a measure of the information quality provided by the instructor during course delivery. In addition, the perceived balance of challenge and skill necessary to be successful in the course also affected the satisfaction with the course. The balance of challenge and skill necessary for the online delivery of the e-learning experience is a measure of the system quality. Information quality can also be electronically delivered and assessed by individuals with an information system being absent from the process. In a business environment, the information needs of managers in different functional areas are critical aspects during the evaluation of information and subsequently its quality (Beard and Peterson, 2003). For students, information needs may vary from course to course as well as among various homework assignment styles (e.g. quizzes, short-answer questions, and case studies). The concluding goal of this study ends with a discussion of how an information system can facilitate the delivery of the required information. While the ISS model is used in many instances, a basic assumption of the model is one of voluntary use by the user. This assumption is incorrect in the context of university e-learning courses where usage of the system is required to complete the coursework. Usage of a non-voluntary system is not without its parallels in industry. The implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems for many companies requires the usage of these systems by employees. This industry need has translated these requirements into ERP system courses (Davis and Comeau, 2004). Since the usage of e-learning systems in academic settings is not voluntary, the application and possible changes to the ISS model to an online course environment is a necessary and critical extension of the study of information systems. This study applies the ISS model to study e-learning systems (ELS) in the context of individual impact for a student online environment. The remainder of this article presents the ISS model with its standard constructs. The methodology used to assess the study is reviewed. The data analysis and results are then addressed. Finally, a discussion of the conclusions along with limitations are presented. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW The ISS model (DeLone and McLean, 1992) is among the most influential theories in predicting and explaining system use, user satisfaction, and IS success (Halawi, McCarthy, & Aronson, 2008; Guimaraes, Armstrong, & Jones, 2009). The ISS model can be used to assess ELS success due to the solid theoretical foundation and the numerous, successful empirical studies. The base ISS model consists of six constructs or dimensions: (1) system quality, (2) information quality, (3) systems use, (4) user satisfaction, (5) individual impact and (6) organizational impact. …" @default.
• W1496780706 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1496780706 creator A5000362652 @default.
• W1496780706 creator A5014519024 @default.
• W1496780706 creator A5024218191 @default.
• W1496780706 creator A5082406647 @default.
• W1496780706 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W1496780706 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1496780706 title "IS Success Model in E-Learning Context Based on Students' Perceptions." @default.
• W1496780706 cites W130169576 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1578369480 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1601493674 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1607291095 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1721421031 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1964121684 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1973400909 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1985875414 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1986262965 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2003553188 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2014858765 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2017987098 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2023407407 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2037021532 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2052556483 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2054202486 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2056884333 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2057012437 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2067408842 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2067422547 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2070063698 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2083495577 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2088716340 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2088832942 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2097421654 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2119681300 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2127455238 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2311585833 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2795656446 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2903059257 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2903415283 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2908934668 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W2990852971 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W3015634246 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W45497666 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W48899032 @default.
• W1496780706 cites W1516261653 @default.
• W1496780706 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1496780706 type Work @default.
• W1496780706 sameAs 1496780706 @default.
• W1496780706 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062012 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062013 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062014 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062015 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062016 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062017 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062018 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062019 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062020 @default.
• W1496780706 countsByYear W14967807062021 @default.
• W1496780706 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1496780706 hasAuthorship W1496780706A5000362652 @default.
• W1496780706 hasAuthorship W1496780706A5014519024 @default.
• W1496780706 hasAuthorship W1496780706A5024218191 @default.
• W1496780706 hasAuthorship W1496780706A5082406647 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C2778365744 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C45983554 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C111472728 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C119599485 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C127413603 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C138885662 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C145420912 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C151730666 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C15744967 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C169760540 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C180198813 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C26760741 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C2778365744 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C2779343474 @default.
• W1496780706 hasConceptScore W1496780706C2779530757 @default.

• next