Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1497029893> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W1497029893 endingPage "9" @default.
- W1497029893 startingPage "9" @default.
- W1497029893 abstract "height was about 6 inches. The number of buds retained was not counted but exceeded 100 per vine. The trial was designed as a randomized complete block with six replications, each replication consisting of six vines. The vines were pruned in the same manner for three consecutive years. Just before harvest, berry clusters were sampled from the six vines in each replication for maturity determination. The yields for each replication were taken by hand and calculated on a per-acre basis. Results The cane- and spur-pruned vines had similar yields (table 1). Vines pruned by the simulated mechanical method outyielded both of the others in each year. The three-year average yield of the mechanically pruned vines was about onethird greater than that of either cane- or spur-pruned vines. At harvest, grape clusters were sampled randomly from each replication in each treatment for a composite quality analysis. Fruit maturity, as reflected in soluble solids and titratable acidities, was similar in the cane- and mechanically pruned plots, although pH was slightly lower in the mechanically pruned plots. Spur-pruned vines, with higher soluble solids and pH and lower titratable acidity, had slightly more mature fruit at harvest than did the other vines. No observable problems were associated with the 52-inch single wire trellis. Wind had little or no adverse effect. Sunburning of clusters was no different than with the 32-inch head wire with two foliar support wires. Neither powdery mildew nor bunch rot was ever a problem on the vines trained to the single high wire. Conclusion Cane- and spur-pruned vines produced comparable yields over a three-year period. Vines pruned by a simulated mechanical method significantly outyielded both cane- and spur-pruned vines: the threeyear averages showed the simulated mechanically pruned vines to be about onethird higher in yield. Cane-pruned (upper) and spur-pruned vines (lower) had similar yields in three-year test." @default.
- W1497029893 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1497029893 creator A5036957283 @default.
- W1497029893 date "1987-01-01" @default.
- W1497029893 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W1497029893 title "A comparison of three methods of pruning Gewurztraminer" @default.
- W1497029893 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
- W1497029893 type Work @default.
- W1497029893 sameAs 1497029893 @default.
- W1497029893 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1497029893 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1497029893 hasAuthorship W1497029893A5036957283 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C108010975 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C139019045 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C144938864 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C189775405 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2776034682 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2776821462 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2777108408 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2777523825 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2779336322 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2780924976 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C2781214258 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C47452053 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C55952523 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C108010975 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C139019045 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C144027150 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C144938864 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C189775405 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2776034682 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2776821462 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2777108408 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2777523825 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2779336322 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2780924976 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C2781214258 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C31903555 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C33923547 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C47452053 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C55493867 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C55952523 @default.
- W1497029893 hasConceptScore W1497029893C86803240 @default.
- W1497029893 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1497029893 hasLocation W14970298931 @default.
- W1497029893 hasOpenAccess W1497029893 @default.
- W1497029893 hasPrimaryLocation W14970298931 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W1411708892 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W1976683727 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2037389279 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2056596669 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2069350024 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2169254727 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2317460384 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2324029760 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2329287082 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2336438801 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2339274322 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2340397832 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2343717818 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2616696284 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2765342413 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2806989208 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2903325352 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2905539617 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2910368023 @default.
- W1497029893 hasRelatedWork W2029989111 @default.
- W1497029893 hasVolume "41" @default.
- W1497029893 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1497029893 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1497029893 magId "1497029893" @default.
- W1497029893 workType "article" @default.