FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1497078923> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1497078923 abstract "Many kinds of social, participatory and citizen oriented platforms make up today's media landscape. Many claim that open source and collaborative media change the ways we think about citizenship (Jenkins). Tim O'Reilly claims that Web 2.0 applications a natural architecture of participation (2005). Yet social constructionists, feminists and sceptics caution against attributing new technologies with these kinds of natural characteristics. Drawing from the cultural history of early internet and mobile technologies, this research asks what, is meaningful about technologically specific ideas of In order to answer this question, I draw from theories of standard and cultural citizenship; analyze a sample of technologically specific ideas of citizenship (e.g. netizenship, e-citizenship, technological citizenship, cyber citizenship); and conduct in depth empirical analysis of two case studies. Theoretically, this research synthesizes and builds upon citizenship theories beginning with T. H. Marshall and followed by cultural citizenship (e.g. Pakulski 1997; Isin and Wood 1999; Stevenson 2001; 2003). From this conceptual frame, the empirical patterns of connection are analyzed along three primary axes: membership systems; rights and obligations; and participatory strategies. Technologically specific ideas of citizenship fit well with theories of cultural citizenship and cultural rights closely resemble most of those rights that are also technologically specific such as rights to: participate, ideational and symbolic spheres, voice, to representation and to innovate. The cases are of two citizenship initiatives using internet or mobile platforms: the BBC's iCan project and Proboscis' Urban Tapestries project. While these projects emerged on the cusp of social media, both cases are early iterations of participatory media. Both cases provide insights into articulations of changing ideas of citizenship and participatory practices. Technologically specific ideas of citizenship are conditional. Project users engage different kinds of membership than producers and there is an uneven distribution of cultural rights which favours producers. As a result, users engage different and mostly shallow patterns of participation. In contrast, producers have broader membership networks, stronger protection of rights and show more variation in deeper more collectively oriented participatory strategies. In the case of limited or partial forms of participation, findings suggest that citizenship language is used as an active manipulative strategy to centralize media organizations as dominant sites. I argue that the characteristics of technologically specific ideas of citizenship mark a distinct moment in the history of media and citizenship; a moment characterized by the emergence of public citizenship. The idea of citizenship attempts to capture the ways in which technologically specific ideas of citizenship, at least in practice, involve making space for ordinary people in cultural institutions." @default.
• W1497078923 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1497078923 creator A5079946857 @default.
• W1497078923 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1497078923 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1497078923 title "New technologies and the idea of citizenship: Patterns of public participation in two cases." @default.
• W1497078923 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1497078923 type Work @default.
• W1497078923 sameAs 1497078923 @default.
• W1497078923 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1497078923 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1497078923 hasAuthorship W1497078923A5079946857 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C203663800 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C2780781376 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C144024400 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C17744445 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C199539241 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C203663800 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C2780781376 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C29595303 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C39549134 @default.
• W1497078923 hasConceptScore W1497078923C94625758 @default.
• W1497078923 hasLocation W14970789231 @default.
• W1497078923 hasOpenAccess W1497078923 @default.
• W1497078923 hasPrimaryLocation W14970789231 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W1140263253 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W13598 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W1514690863 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W1516358157 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W153555557 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W1607251222 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W1991800439 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2011374851 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2123455188 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2176666135 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2269125392 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2591722969 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2732339389 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2752249608 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2985953301 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W3040988348 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W3048752839 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W426528498 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2337265630 @default.
• W1497078923 hasRelatedWork W2745650681 @default.
• W1497078923 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1497078923 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1497078923 magId "1497078923" @default.
• W1497078923 workType "dissertation" @default.