FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1497152069> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1497152069 endingPage "379" @default.
• W1497152069 startingPage "366" @default.
• W1497152069 abstract "Abstract Background Executive functioning (EF) is an important concept in cognitive psychology that has rarely been studied in people with intellectual disabilities (IDs). The aim of this study was to examine the validity of two test batteries and the structure of EF in this client group. Methods We administered the children's version of the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS‐C) and the Cambridge Executive Functioning Assessment (CEFA) for people with ID, to 40 participants who attended day centres for people with mild to moderate learning disabilities [mean full‐scale intelligence quotient (IQ) = 59]. The BADS‐C consists of six EF subtests while the CEFA contains eight EF (including two executive memory) subtests and four memory subtests. IQ and receptive language ability were also assessed. The results were subjected to principal components analysis, and regression analysis was used to examine the relationship of the ensuing factors to other cognitive variables. Results Scores on both sets of EF tests were only weakly related to receptive language ability, and even more weakly related to IQ. Scores on the BADS‐C were substantially lower than predicted from the published norms for people in higher IQ ranges, and many participants scored zero on three of the six subtests. This potential floor effect was less evident with scores on the CEFA. Principal components analyses produced one usable factor for the BADS‐C, and two factors for the CEFA that differed in both the extent of involvement of working memory and the predominant sensory modality. A combined analysis of the subtests retained from both analyses produced three factors that related uniquely to aspects of IQ and memory. Conclusions The CEFA is suitable for use with people with mild to moderate learning disabilities, whereas the BADS‐C is at the lower limit of usability with this client group. The lower‐than‐expected scores observed on the BADS‐C may indicate that people known to learning disability services may be more impaired than people of comparable IQ not known to services. The structure of EF seen in people with IDs closely resembles a model of EF in the general population that has received a broad level of support." @default.
• W1497152069 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1497152069 creator A5052654778 @default.
• W1497152069 creator A5054182998 @default.
• W1497152069 creator A5061886376 @default.
• W1497152069 creator A5071784433 @default.
• W1497152069 date "2010-03-20" @default.
• W1497152069 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1497152069 title "Evaluation of executive functioning in people with intellectual disabilities" @default.
• W1497152069 cites W11743480 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1704508652 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1965086680 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1973477197 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1975160267 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1980584599 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1986439041 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1992149782 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W1997311689 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2000402306 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2012977954 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2017868723 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2022633220 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2037682089 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2042795854 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2056299683 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2058452461 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2061028272 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2067791316 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2071847472 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2072110782 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2072529362 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2073172913 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2075259367 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2078602234 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2091209934 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2091715906 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2094371263 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2094998507 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2109962259 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2120357670 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2121001056 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2124517301 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2124745896 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2125144546 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2125963513 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2127016810 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2134074311 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2136170254 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2136582464 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2140680574 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2155170774 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2156343652 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2232548624 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W2279179827 @default.
• W1497152069 cites W4229665788 @default.
• W1497152069 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01249.x" @default.
• W1497152069 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20433573" @default.
• W1497152069 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1497152069 type Work @default.
• W1497152069 sameAs 1497152069 @default.
• W1497152069 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692012 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692013 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692014 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692015 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692016 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692017 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692018 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692019 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692020 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692021 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692022 @default.
• W1497152069 countsByYear W14971520692023 @default.
• W1497152069 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1497152069 hasAuthorship W1497152069A5052654778 @default.
• W1497152069 hasAuthorship W1497152069A5054182998 @default.
• W1497152069 hasAuthorship W1497152069A5061886376 @default.
• W1497152069 hasAuthorship W1497152069A5071784433 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C15107229 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C166047926 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C21963081 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C2775968953 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C2779168175 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C551499885 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConcept C89798072 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C118552586 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C138496976 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C15107229 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C15744967 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C166047926 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C169900460 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C21963081 @default.
• W1497152069 hasConceptScore W1497152069C2775968953 @default.

• next