FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1499235482> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1499235482 endingPage "802" @default.
• W1499235482 startingPage "801" @default.
• W1499235482 abstract "Reviewed by: The Mastery of Submission: Inventions of Masochism Vern L. Bullough John K. Noyes. The Mastery of Submission: Inventions of Masochism. Cornell Studies in the History of Psychiatry. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997. viii + 265 pp. Ill. $29.95; £23.50. The term masochism was coined by Richard von Krafft-Ebing in 1890 from the name of the Austrian historian and novelist Leopold von Sacher-Masoch. In his best-selling novel Venus in Furs, Sacher-Masoch had told the story of Severin, a passionate and idealistic nobleman caught between the dictates of reason, domination, and control—everything that society told a man he should be—and his own peculiar passion for submitting to the cruelty of dominant women. As the widow Wanda von Dunajew punishes him ever-more-severely, his unrequited love continues to grow, until he finally receives a beating at the hands of Wanda’s lover that causes him to turn his back on his masochistic pleasure and to become a dominant male instead. Noyes argues in The Mastery of Submission that modern masochism was invented as a response to a specific problem in modern society—namely, that of [End Page 801] individuals in whom the economy of reward and punishment had not only broken down but failed, because it was not clear what were the correct and incorrect uses of aggression. The solution to this crisis in masculinity was to adopt a mode of conceptualization and a technology that allowed incorrect aggressivity to be identified and circumscribed within the body and dealt with according to a definite set of rules. The masochist’s body in effect becomes a machine that can either reduce nonproductive aggressivity to an individual pathology, or transform social control into sexual pleasure. In a wide-ranging examination of recent European intellectual history, Noyes, a professor of German in South Africa, gives particular attention to many of the German-language writers—from Iwan Bloch to Magnus Hirschfeld to Sigmund Freud, as well as many of Freud’s disciples, particularly Wilhelm Reich, Theodor Reik, and Karen Horney. He also looks at some of the current generation of theorists, from Michel Foucault to Jacques Lacan, and to specific writers on masochism such as Pat Califa and Tom Weinberg, to support his arguments. Although Noyes pays some attention to the earlier history of masochism, as did Krafft-Ebing, he does not emphasize, at least in my opinion, just how deeply masochism is embodied in the Western conscience in the Christian emphasis on suffering. Even the very techniques of masochistic suffering remain the same. It was through such suffering that the submissive and dedicated believer achieved the ecstacy of feeling at one with God, having undergone the suffering, at least as much as an ordinary human could experience it, so associated with Jesus. Because Krafft-Ebing defined and described masochism in the nineteenth century, however, it becomes for Noyes a modern technology of the erotics of subjective disappearance. Modern masochism focuses on technologies of submissiveness, on machines and instruments that connect the desiring subject to his or her own disappearance. Just as struggles for political power in our age have increasingly become struggles for the technology that grants access to the world of virtual reality, Noyes holds that the problem of masochism demonstrates that struggles for subjectivity are increasingly becoming struggles for access to and control of the technologies in which subjects are constructed and subjects disappear. My question, after reading this well-constructed and deeply analytical essay, is whether this desire for subjective disappearance is really new or particularly unique. Have we simply used modern terms to reexplain and define what has long been a “pathology” inherent in societies with a Western Christian tradition? Noyes points out that although there is a tradition of masochism, it is the modern crisis in masculinity that has caused the twentieth-century version. I remain unconvinced. Still, Noyes raises important questions, and there are plenty of footnotes and a ten-page bibliography to help interested readers trace the path whereby he has arrived at his conclusion. Vern L. Bullough University of Southern California Copyright © 1998 The Johns Hopkins University Press" @default.
• W1499235482 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1499235482 creator A5000775081 @default.
• W1499235482 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W1499235482 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1499235482 title "Book Review: The Mastery of Submission: Inventions of Masochism" @default.
• W1499235482 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.1998.0200" @default.
• W1499235482 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W1499235482 type Work @default.
• W1499235482 sameAs 1499235482 @default.
• W1499235482 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1499235482 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1499235482 hasAuthorship W1499235482A5000775081 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C2777113389 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C2780226355 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C2780310893 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C11171543 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C124952713 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C138885662 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C142362112 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C15744967 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C2777113389 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C2780226355 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C2780310893 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C52119013 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C542102704 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C73484699 @default.
• W1499235482 hasConceptScore W1499235482C77805123 @default.
• W1499235482 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1499235482 hasLocation W14992354821 @default.
• W1499235482 hasOpenAccess W1499235482 @default.
• W1499235482 hasPrimaryLocation W14992354821 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W1983606418 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2020567570 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2064724962 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2244057539 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2991301064 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W3140653885 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W66913553 @default.
• W1499235482 hasRelatedWork W2986670782 @default.
• W1499235482 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W1499235482 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1499235482 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1499235482 magId "1499235482" @default.
• W1499235482 workType "article" @default.