FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1501499667> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1501499667 endingPage "683" @default.
• W1501499667 startingPage "679" @default.
• W1501499667 abstract "Summary Reasons for performing study: Distal border synovial invaginations of the distal sesamoid bone are radiographically assessed during the selection process of horses admitted as breeding stallions or in purchase examinations. Nowadays, many moderately or some deeply penetrating proximally enlarged synovial invaginations are considered as moderate or severe radiographic findings. Objective: To measure the difference between and agreement of the morphology of distal border synovial invaginations on radiography vs. computed tomography (CT). It was hypothesised that the morphology of distal border synovial invaginations would be better evaluable on CT compared with radiography. Methods: Computed tomography scans and 3 dorsoproximal–palmarodistal oblique (DPr‐PaDiO) radiographs were obtained on 50 cadaver forefeet from 25 Warmblood horses. Computed tomography was assumed to be the gold standard. The number, shape and depth of penetration of distal border synovial invaginations into the distal sesamoid bone were evaluated with both methods, and the comparison of their measurements was statistically described. Results: A statistically significant mean difference for number of distal synovial invaginations between CT and all 3 DPr‐PaDiO projections was found and was approximately equal to 2, meaning that CT permits visualisation of an average of 2 more invaginations than radiography. In none of the cases did radiography have a higher number observed than CT. A large variation in the difference of measurements for depth of penetration against their mean difference between CT and the 3 radiographic projections was seen. Radiography underestimated the depth of invaginations, and more so when these were deeper. There was no statistically significant mean difference found between the techniques for depth. A moderate to good agreement between measurements on CT and the three DPr‐PaDiO projections for shape was seen, in which the D55°Pr‐PaDiO projection showed the best agreement. A high specificity (90–99%) and low sensitivity (65%) for all projections for shape were found. Conclusions and potential relevance: Radiography differs considerably from CT concerning the morphology of distal navicular border synovial invaginations. For the evaluation of the number, depth and shape of distal synovial invaginations in the distal sesamoid bone, radiography shows only partially the morphology seen on CT." @default.
• W1501499667 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5033280855 @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5043276679 @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5045890136 @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5074079751 @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5085961217 @default.
• W1501499667 creator A5089291740 @default.
• W1501499667 date "2012-02-15" @default.
• W1501499667 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1501499667 title "Differences in the morphology of distal border synovial invaginations of the distal sesamoid bone in the horse as evaluated by computed tomography compared with radiography" @default.
• W1501499667 cites W1967801319 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W1977403824 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2000094432 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2007096090 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2015510403 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2043792915 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2054171307 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2055764840 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2088136622 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2093692543 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2094491458 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2106697289 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2149509865 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2151125615 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2158479401 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W1501499667 cites W2549786271 @default.
• W1501499667 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00547.x" @default.
• W1501499667 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22332711" @default.
• W1501499667 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1501499667 type Work @default.
• W1501499667 sameAs 1501499667 @default.
• W1501499667 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672012 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672013 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672014 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672017 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672019 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672020 @default.
• W1501499667 countsByYear W15014996672022 @default.
• W1501499667 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5033280855 @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5043276679 @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5045890136 @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5074079751 @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5085961217 @default.
• W1501499667 hasAuthorship W1501499667A5089291740 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C2910849840 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C105702510 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C126322002 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C126838900 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C163716698 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C2910849840 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C2989005 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C3018023364 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C36454342 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C544519230 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C71924100 @default.
• W1501499667 hasConceptScore W1501499667C91762617 @default.
• W1501499667 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1501499667 hasLocation W15014996671 @default.
• W1501499667 hasLocation W15014996672 @default.
• W1501499667 hasOpenAccess W1501499667 @default.
• W1501499667 hasPrimaryLocation W15014996671 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2012473633 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2036100958 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2108326938 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2140429659 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2151243520 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2412348355 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2756112557 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2971758066 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W33257673 @default.
• W1501499667 hasRelatedWork W2553626771 @default.
• W1501499667 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W1501499667 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1501499667 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1501499667 magId "1501499667" @default.
• W1501499667 workType "article" @default.