Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W150269> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W150269 endingPage "33" @default.
- W150269 startingPage "729" @default.
- W150269 abstract "A prospective study was undertaken to critically evaluate the endocervical curettage. The study group consisted of 261 patients with colposcopically identifiable cervical lesions that had not been previously biopsied and were not macroscopically suspicious for invasive cancer. In 210 patients, the entire lesion, transformation zone, and squamocolumnar junction were visible (satisfactory colposcopy), and in 51 patients, the full extent of the lesion was not visualized colposcopically (unsatisfactory colposcopy). We used a method of examination not previously described. Colposcopy was performed before and after the endocervical curettage, but before the ectocervical biopsy. This method of examination allowed us to identify potentially contaminated endocervical curettages and to test the null hypothesis that a positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory colposcopy is not the result of contamination. Twenty of 210 endocervical curettages in patients with satisfactory colposcopy were potentially contaminated, as suggested by an ectocervical lesion disrupted by the endocervical curettage. No patient with a positive endocervical curettage had an intact ectocervical lesion. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected (P less than .005). Of the 51 patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy, 39 (76%) underwent cone biopsy. Invasive cancer was diagnosed by cone biopsy in two patients when both ectocervical biopsy and endocervical curettage demonstrated only dysplasia. We also confirmed that patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy occasionally benefit from having an endocervical curettage. However, basing the treatment plan for any lesion short of invasive cancer solely on the results of colposcopy, ectocervical biopsy, and/or endocervical curettage could lead to significant undertreatment of some patients." @default.
- W150269 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W150269 creator A5020244659 @default.
- W150269 creator A5032818424 @default.
- W150269 creator A5035968604 @default.
- W150269 creator A5071847246 @default.
- W150269 date "1987-11-01" @default.
- W150269 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W150269 title "A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage." @default.
- W150269 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3658281" @default.
- W150269 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
- W150269 type Work @default.
- W150269 sameAs 150269 @default.
- W150269 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W150269 countsByYear W1502692012 @default.
- W150269 countsByYear W1502692015 @default.
- W150269 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W150269 hasAuthorship W150269A5020244659 @default.
- W150269 hasAuthorship W150269A5032818424 @default.
- W150269 hasAuthorship W150269A5035968604 @default.
- W150269 hasAuthorship W150269A5071847246 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2775924586 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2776117191 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2777343196 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2779381500 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2779904257 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W150269 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C121608353 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C126322002 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C126838900 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C141071460 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2775924586 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2775934546 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2776117191 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2777343196 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2778220009 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2779381500 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2779904257 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C2781156865 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C29456083 @default.
- W150269 hasConceptScore W150269C71924100 @default.
- W150269 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W150269 hasLocation W1502691 @default.
- W150269 hasOpenAccess W150269 @default.
- W150269 hasPrimaryLocation W1502691 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W150269 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W182258860 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W1974674094 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W1997580405 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W1999936488 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W2028225567 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W2145244020 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W2155232306 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W2335254191 @default.
- W150269 hasRelatedWork W1615866627 @default.
- W150269 hasVolume "70" @default.
- W150269 isParatext "false" @default.
- W150269 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W150269 magId "150269" @default.
- W150269 workType "article" @default.