FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1504308781> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1504308781 endingPage "767" @default.
• W1504308781 startingPage "760" @default.
• W1504308781 abstract "The aim is to determine, from the patient's perspective, what constitutes a good hand-off procedure in the emergency department (ED). The secondary purpose is to evaluate what impact a formalized hand-off had on patient knowledge, throughput and customer serviceThis study used a randomized controlled clinical trial involving two unique hand-off approaches and a convenience sample. The study alternated between the current hand-off process that documented the process but not specific elements (referred to as the informal process) to one using the IPASS the BATON process (considered the formal process). Consenting patients completed a 12-question validated questionnaire on how the process was perceived by patients and about their understanding why they waited in the ED. Statistical analysis using SPSS calculated descriptive frequencies and t-tests.In total 107 patients were enrolled: 50 in the informal and 57 in the formal group. Most patients had positive answers to the customer survey. There were significant differences between formal and informal groups: recalling the oncoming and outgoing physician coming to the patient's bed (p = 0.000), with more formal group recalling that than informal group patients; the oncoming physician introducing him/herself (p = 0.01), with more from the formal group answering yes and the physician discussing tests and implications with formal group patients (p = 0.02).This study was done at an urban inner city ED, a fact that may have skewed its results. A comparison of suburban and rural EDs would make the results stronger. It also reflected a very high level of customer satisfaction within the ED. This lack of variance may have meant that the correlation between customer service and handoffs was missed or underrepresented. There was no codified observation of either those using the IPASS the BATON script or those using informal procedures, so no comparison of level and types of information given between the two groups was done. There could have been a bias of those attending who had internalized the IPASS the BATON procedures and used them even when they were assigned to the informal group.A hand off from one physician to the next in the emergency department is best done using a formalized process. IPASS the BATON is a useful tool for hand off in the ED in part because it involved the patient in the process. The formal hand off increased communication between patient and doctor as its use increased the patient's opportunity to ask and respond to questions.The researchers evaluated an ED physician specific hand-off process and illustrate the value and impact of involving patients in the hand-off process." @default.
• W1504308781 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1504308781 creator A5020620233 @default.
• W1504308781 creator A5023472542 @default.
• W1504308781 creator A5028451455 @default.
• W1504308781 date "2013-09-30" @default.
• W1504308781 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1504308781 title "What constitutes a good hand offs in the emergency department: a patient’s perspective" @default.
• W1504308781 cites W1970940013 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2003261045 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2008085607 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2009899467 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2028757908 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2074579387 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2100673063 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2111345884 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2114325287 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2151237440 @default.
• W1504308781 cites W2187016637 @default.
• W1504308781 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-03-2012-0028" @default.
• W1504308781 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24422264" @default.
• W1504308781 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1504308781 type Work @default.
• W1504308781 sameAs 1504308781 @default.
• W1504308781 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1504308781 countsByYear W15043087812017 @default.
• W1504308781 countsByYear W15043087812018 @default.
• W1504308781 countsByYear W15043087812020 @default.
• W1504308781 countsByYear W15043087812021 @default.
• W1504308781 countsByYear W15043087812022 @default.
• W1504308781 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1504308781 hasAuthorship W1504308781A5020620233 @default.
• W1504308781 hasAuthorship W1504308781A5023472542 @default.
• W1504308781 hasAuthorship W1504308781A5028451455 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C105795698 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C111919701 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C12713177 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C127413603 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C129848803 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C141071460 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C154945302 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C15744967 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C159110408 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C168563851 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C185592680 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C198531522 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C21547014 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C2780724011 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C33923547 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C39896193 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C41008148 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C43617362 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C512399662 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C545542383 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C71924100 @default.
• W1504308781 hasConceptScore W1504308781C98045186 @default.
• W1504308781 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1504308781 hasLocation W15043087811 @default.
• W1504308781 hasLocation W15043087812 @default.
• W1504308781 hasOpenAccess W1504308781 @default.
• W1504308781 hasPrimaryLocation W15043087811 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W137934666 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2022144308 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2065736450 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2192756893 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2754215651 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W2977415510 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W3204985135 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W4250644009 @default.
• W1504308781 hasRelatedWork W4311478311 @default.
• W1504308781 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W1504308781 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1504308781 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1504308781 magId "1504308781" @default.
• W1504308781 workType "article" @default.