Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1505030735> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- W1505030735 endingPage "396" @default.
- W1505030735 startingPage "388" @default.
- W1505030735 abstract "In a familiar limerick attributed to Ronald Knox, the narrator asks how a “tree/should continue to be/when there’s no one about in the Quad,” and is subsequently reassured that its continuous existence is guaranteed by God’s being “always about in the Quad” observing it. This is meant to capture Berkeley’s so-called ‘continuity argument’ for the existence of God, on which the claim that objects exist continuously over time is supposed to entail the existence of a Divine Mind that continuously perceives the ideas that constitute those objects. But the continuity argument is not an uncontroversial one. For one thing, we might ask what divine perception is supposed to be like – does God perceive all of the ideas that we do, and in the same way that we do? And if so, does this mean that God (like us) perceives pain – that God suffers? For another thing, we might ask whether Berkeley is entitled to the claim that objects exist continuously to begin with. In this paper, I look at some of the problems associated with the continuity argument, and then present a reading of divine perception that attempts to prevent these problems from arising at the outset." @default.
- W1505030735 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1505030735 creator A5051946111 @default.
- W1505030735 date "2012-05-03" @default.
- W1505030735 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1505030735 title "Berkeley and God in the Quad" @default.
- W1505030735 cites W1998848251 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2013499939 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W20373266 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2058086018 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2063299938 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2085136597 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2094189572 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2111448924 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W2159661960 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W4241856274 @default.
- W1505030735 cites W78763203 @default.
- W1505030735 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00487.x" @default.
- W1505030735 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1505030735 type Work @default.
- W1505030735 sameAs 1505030735 @default.
- W1505030735 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352013 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352014 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352015 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352017 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352019 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352020 @default.
- W1505030735 countsByYear W15050307352023 @default.
- W1505030735 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1505030735 hasAuthorship W1505030735A5051946111 @default.
- W1505030735 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1505030735 hasConceptScore W1505030735C138885662 @default.
- W1505030735 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W1505030735 hasLocation W15050307351 @default.
- W1505030735 hasOpenAccess W1505030735 @default.
- W1505030735 hasPrimaryLocation W15050307351 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W1030430500 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W1494974852 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W1994846741 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2227612306 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2803307177 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2912137438 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W3214635344 @default.
- W1505030735 hasRelatedWork W2346533055 @default.
- W1505030735 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W1505030735 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1505030735 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1505030735 magId "1505030735" @default.
- W1505030735 workType "article" @default.