FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1505514170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1505514170 endingPage "641" @default.
• W1505514170 startingPage "625" @default.
• W1505514170 abstract "Purpose Nurse shortage and rising healthcare resource burdens mean that appropriate workforce use is imperative. This paper aims to evaluate whether daily nursing staffing meets ward workload needs. Design/methodology/approach Nurse attendance and daily nurses' workload capacity in three hospitals were evaluated. Statistical process control was used to evaluate intra‐ward nurse workload capacity and day‐to‐day variations. Statistical process control is a statistics‐based method for process monitoring that uses charts with predefined target measure and control limits. Standardization was performed for inter‐ward analysis by converting ward‐specific crude measures to ward‐specific relative measures by dividing observed/expected. Two charts: acceptable and tolerable daily nurse workload intensity, were defined. Appropriate staffing indicators were defined as those exceeding predefined rates within acceptable and tolerable limits (50 percent and 80 percent respectively). Findings A total of 42 percent of the overall days fell within acceptable control limits and 71 percent within tolerable control limits. Appropriate staffing indicators were met in only 33 percent of wards regarding acceptable nurse workload intensity and in only 45 percent of wards regarding tolerable workloads. Research limitations/implications The study work did not differentiate crude nurse attendance and it did not take into account patient severity since crude bed occupancy was used. Double statistical process control charts and certain staffing indicators were used, which is open to debate. Practical implications Wards that met appropriate staffing indicators prove the method's feasibility. Wards that did not meet appropriate staffing indicators prove the importance and the need for process evaluations and monitoring. Methods presented for monitoring daily staffing appropriateness are simple to implement either for intra‐ward day‐to‐day variation by using nurse workload capacity statistical process control charts or for inter‐ward evaluation using standardized measure of nurse workload intensity. The real challenge will be to develop planning systems and implement corrective interventions such as dynamic and flexible daily staffing, which will face difficulties and barriers. Originality/value The paper fulfils the need for workforce utilization evaluation. A simple method using available data for daily staffing appropriateness evaluation, which is easy to implement and operate, is presented. The statistical process control method enables intra‐ward evaluation, while standardization by converting crude into relative measures enables inter‐ward analysis. The staffing indicator definitions enable performance evaluation. This original study uses statistical process control to develop simple standardization methods and applies straightforward statistical tools. This method is not limited to crude measures, rather it uses weighted workload measures such as nursing acuity or weighted nurse level (i.e. grade/band)." @default.
• W1505514170 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1505514170 creator A5051066034 @default.
• W1505514170 creator A5085859519 @default.
• W1505514170 date "2009-09-04" @default.
• W1505514170 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1505514170 title "Does daily nurse staffing match ward workload variability?" @default.
• W1505514170 cites W1539699811 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W1968152643 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W1978885444 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W1989620345 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W1994497324 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2008818218 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2027428629 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2035944856 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2038746872 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2043485187 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2052159456 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2068368714 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2072410090 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2078855843 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2088393330 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2127903034 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2161088630 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W2167018762 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W23286771 @default.
• W1505514170 cites W4293242440 @default.
• W1505514170 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860910986885" @default.
• W1505514170 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19957423" @default.
• W1505514170 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1505514170 type Work @default.
• W1505514170 sameAs 1505514170 @default.
• W1505514170 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702013 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702015 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702017 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702018 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702019 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702020 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702021 @default.
• W1505514170 countsByYear W15055141702022 @default.
• W1505514170 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1505514170 hasAuthorship W1505514170A5051066034 @default.
• W1505514170 hasAuthorship W1505514170A5085859519 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C2777512617 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C2778173179 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C111919701 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C127413603 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C154945302 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C159110408 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C162324750 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C21547014 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C2775924081 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C2777512617 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C2778173179 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C2778476105 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C41008148 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C50522688 @default.
• W1505514170 hasConceptScore W1505514170C71924100 @default.
• W1505514170 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1505514170 hasLocation W15055141701 @default.
• W1505514170 hasLocation W15055141702 @default.
• W1505514170 hasOpenAccess W1505514170 @default.
• W1505514170 hasPrimaryLocation W15055141701 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W1580068558 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W1753697959 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W2012137676 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W2102386024 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W2375678343 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W2414774001 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W3087250750 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W3123029472 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W3147352365 @default.
• W1505514170 hasRelatedWork W3177361501 @default.
• W1505514170 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W1505514170 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1505514170 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1505514170 magId "1505514170" @default.
• W1505514170 workType "article" @default.