FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1506288911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1506288911 endingPage "651" @default.
• W1506288911 startingPage "646" @default.
• W1506288911 abstract "BACKGROUND Interprofessional collaboration improves the quality of care, but integration into workflow is challenging. Although a shared conceptualization regarding bedside interprofessional rounds may enhance implementation, little work has investigated providers' perceptions of this activity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the perceptions of nurses, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians regarding the benefits/barriers to bedside interprofessional rounds. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS Observational, cross‐sectional survey of hospital‐based medicine nurses, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians. Descriptive, nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and nonparametric correlation were used. MAIN MEASURES Bedside interprofessional rounds were defined as “encounters including 2 physicians plus a nurse or other care provider discussing the case at the patient's bedside.” Eighteen items related to “benefits” and 21 items related to “barriers” associated with bedside interprofessional rounds. RESULTS Of 171 surveys sent, 149 were completed (87%). Highest‐ranked benefits were related to communication/coordination, including “improves communication between nurses‐physicians;” lowest‐ranked benefits were related to efficiency, process, and outcomes, including “decreases length‐of‐stay” and “improves timeliness of consultations.” Nurses reported most favorable ratings for all items ( P < 0.05). Rank order for 3 provider groups showed high correlation ( r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Highest‐ranked barriers were related to time, including “nursing staff have limited time;” lowest‐ranked barriers were related to provider‐ and patient‐related factors, including “patient lack of comfort.” Rank order of barriers among all groups showed moderate correlation ( r = 0.62–0.82). CONCLUSIONS Although nurses perceived greater benefit for bedside interprofessional rounds than physicians, all providers perceived coordination/teamwork benefits higher than outcomes. To the extent the results are generalizable, these findings lay the foundation for facilitating meaningful patient‐centered interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:646–651. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine" @default.
• W1506288911 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1506288911 creator A5037966769 @default.
• W1506288911 creator A5040110644 @default.
• W1506288911 creator A5062302785 @default.
• W1506288911 creator A5086644562 @default.
• W1506288911 date "2014-08-06" @default.
• W1506288911 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1506288911 title "Bedside interprofessional rounds: Perceptions of benefits and barriers by internal medicine nursing staff, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians" @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1522958396 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1969507127 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1979033441 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1979569416 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1979945444 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1991081936 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1991441786 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1991989691 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W1995243335 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2002598340 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2019311537 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2024102527 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2040982319 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2045913066 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2049597961 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2050039199 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2051345245 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2052224775 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2054839870 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2061157445 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2082799265 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2100353479 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2105782270 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2153300884 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2316214985 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2325983884 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W2335407278 @default.
• W1506288911 cites W4248857718 @default.
• W1506288911 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2245" @default.
• W1506288911 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25130404" @default.
• W1506288911 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1506288911 type Work @default.
• W1506288911 sameAs 1506288911 @default.
• W1506288911 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112015 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112016 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112017 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112018 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112019 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112020 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112021 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112022 @default.
• W1506288911 countsByYear W15062889112023 @default.
• W1506288911 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1506288911 hasAuthorship W1506288911A5037966769 @default.
• W1506288911 hasAuthorship W1506288911A5040110644 @default.
• W1506288911 hasAuthorship W1506288911A5062302785 @default.
• W1506288911 hasAuthorship W1506288911A5086644562 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C2780358146 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C126322002 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C142052008 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C142724271 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C159110408 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C17744445 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C199539241 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C23131810 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C2779473830 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C2780358146 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C512399662 @default.
• W1506288911 hasConceptScore W1506288911C71924100 @default.
• W1506288911 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W1506288911 hasLocation W15062889111 @default.
• W1506288911 hasLocation W15062889112 @default.
• W1506288911 hasOpenAccess W1506288911 @default.
• W1506288911 hasPrimaryLocation W15062889111 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W1533309927 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W1688175311 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W1984720268 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W2030936866 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W2103779230 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W2109147503 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W2322581019 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W3141050733 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W334096847 @default.
• W1506288911 hasRelatedWork W4381328000 @default.
• W1506288911 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W1506288911 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1506288911 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1506288911 magId "1506288911" @default.

• next