FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1506802150> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1506802150 endingPage "123" @default.
• W1506802150 startingPage "117" @default.
• W1506802150 abstract "Abstract Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of an airborne‐particle abraded zirconia, an acid‐etched zirconia (Piranha solution), an Alloy Primer treated zirconia, and a silaned zirconia to enamel, all bonded with a phosphate‐methacrylate resin luting agent. Materials and Methods Seventy extracted intact human molars were collected, cleaned, and mounted in autopolymerizing acrylic resin, with the experimental surface of the teeth exposed. The specimens were randomly divided into seven groups of zirconia specimens (4 mm diameter, 2 mm thick). Group 1: Airborne‐particle abrasion; group 2: Airborne‐particle abrasion and Z‐PRIME Plus; group 3: Airborne‐particle abrasion and alloy primer; group 4: Piranha solution 7:1; group 5: Piranha solution 7:1 and Z‐PRIME Plus; group 6: Piranha solution 7:1 and Alloy primer; group 7: CoJet and silane. All specimens were luted with a phosphate‐methacrylate resin luting agent (Panavia F2.0) and stored in distilled water for 1 day, then thermocycled (5°C and 55°C) for 500 cycles and tested for shear bond strength (SBS), measured in MPa, with a universal testing machine at a 0.55 mm/min crosshead speed. All specimens were inspected under a scanning electron microscope to determine mode of failure. The mean values and standard deviations of all specimens were calculated for each group. A one‐way ANOVA was performed, and multiple pairwise comparisons were then completed with post hoc Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Results The airborne‐particle abrasion and Z‐PRIME Plus group resulted in a significantly higher SBS than the other groups (21.11 ± 6.32 MPa) ( p < 0.001). The CoJet and silane group (15.99 ± 8.92 MPa) and airborne‐particle abrasion and alloy primer group (11.07 ± 4.34 MPa) showed high shear bond strength but not statistically significant from the airborne‐particle abrasion group (14.23 ± 5.68 MPa). Failure mode was predominately mixed in groups 1, 2, 3, and 7 with islands of retained resin on the zirconia and enamel surfaces; however, groups 4, 5, and 6 showed mostly adhesive failures, which left the zirconia surface free of the adhesive materials. No cohesive failures of the substrates (ceramic, resin, or enamel) were observed. Conclusion Airborne‐particle abrasion followed by the application of a zirconia primer produced the highest bond strength to enamel. Therefore, it can be recommended as a promising surface treatment method to achieve a durable bond to densely sintered zirconia ceramics." @default.
• W1506802150 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1506802150 creator A5065774038 @default.
• W1506802150 creator A5069745673 @default.
• W1506802150 creator A5081807832 @default.
• W1506802150 creator A5086241736 @default.
• W1506802150 date "2013-07-26" @default.
• W1506802150 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1506802150 title "An In Vitro Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia to Enamel Using Different Surface Treatments" @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1572901150 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1968881367 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1969804001 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1978765792 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1980709869 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1985773504 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1991024995 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1996978956 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W1997362405 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2006950580 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2009230986 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2014434166 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2025412717 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2028796069 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2030418554 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2037568855 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2055865412 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2058284691 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2064575531 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2092965781 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2094200870 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2102366813 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2106544741 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2126746536 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2136533995 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2136655589 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2144481479 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2145470059 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2149759341 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2152735276 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2153029062 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2156576509 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W2164487642 @default.
• W1506802150 cites W4240459256 @default.
• W1506802150 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12075" @default.
• W1506802150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23890275" @default.
• W1506802150 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1506802150 type Work @default.
• W1506802150 sameAs 1506802150 @default.
• W1506802150 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502013 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502014 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502015 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502016 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502017 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502018 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502019 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502020 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502021 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502022 @default.
• W1506802150 countsByYear W15068021502023 @default.
• W1506802150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1506802150 hasAuthorship W1506802150A5065774038 @default.
• W1506802150 hasAuthorship W1506802150A5069745673 @default.
• W1506802150 hasAuthorship W1506802150A5081807832 @default.
• W1506802150 hasAuthorship W1506802150A5086241736 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C118231568 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C123609680 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C132050475 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C140013486 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C15920480 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C2778265030 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C2779429693 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C2781448156 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C521977710 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C112950240 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C118231568 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C123609680 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C132050475 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C134132462 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C140013486 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C156887251 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C159096172 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C15920480 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C159985019 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C180478085 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C185592680 @default.
• W1506802150 hasConceptScore W1506802150C192562407 @default.

• next