FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1510079046> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1510079046 abstract "Attributions are explanations that individuals give to describe or account for their perception of an event or outcome. The complex nature of sport settings has provided a challenging context for researchers to understand the impact of causal attributions. The purpose of this research was to develop Skills and Techniques for Attribution Retraining (STAR), particularly for application to the athletic domain.  Study 1 was conducted to evaluate attributions for perceived success and failure outcomes of multi-event athletes in a field setting. This study contributed to sport attribution literature in that minimal research has previously examined athletes’ causal explanations in sport utilising globality and intentionality dimensions. Also, prior research in sport has not yet explored the stability of attributions across different events for the same athlete. Five decathletes and one heptathlete (18–62 years old) completed the Revised Sport Attributional Style Scale (R-SASS; Hanrahan & Gross, 2000) following each event and for the overall competition at the Queensland Multi-Event Championship. Performance ratings and scores on internality, globality, stability, intentionality, and personal and external controllability dimensions were examined. Analyses revealed that multi-event athletes tended to make different explanations across events. Dimensional scores for each event did not necessarily reflect participants’ overall perceptions of the competition. However, similar categories of attributions tended to relate to specific dimensions for individual athletes (e.g., “motivation” – indicated three times by a participant – was associated with more global and personally controllable attributions). Performance ratings were significantly correlated with greater stability, globality, and intentionality. Study 2 was an exploratory study that was conducted to examine athletes’ causal attributions. The qualitative approach for this study was unique, as previous researchers have typically utilised questionnaires to assess athletes’ explanations for success and failure. Interviews were conducted with ten elite triathletes (five males, five females; aged 18-30 years). Following inductive content analyses, results indicated that the athletes provided more explanations for success than failure and fewer external factors for success. However, in contrast to existing learned helplessness (LH), self-efficacy, and attributional models of attribution retraining (AR), athletes did not cite ability as a reason for success. While the majority of participants described negative effects of attributions for unsuccessful situations, analyses revealed a variety of factors led to the same type of effect. For example, ‘cramps/stitch’, ‘haven’t done the hard work’, and ‘over-training’ attributions all led to the effect ‘convincing self of having a bad race’. A minority of athletes stated that explanations following an unsuccessful situation led to positive effects. The purpose of Study 3 was to compare across current AR models (as cited above: Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978; Bandura, 1986; Weiner, 1986). In particular, the study was conducted to test the effectiveness of AR where students were given persuasive feedback that was designed to either enhance or decrease performance. Participants were undergraduate, introductory psychology students (N = 61). Students were given two sets of three puzzle cube tasks, and were asked to construct puzzle cube pieces to match each of six shapes provided. Some tasks were impossible and were included to assess persistence. Following the initial set of tasks, students received AR intervention. Participants completed the R-SASS following both sets of tasks. Performance measures included students’ ratings of perceived performance, time to complete possible puzzle cube tasks, and time spent on impossible tasks. Findings revealed a slight trend toward the ability of AR models to change students’ attributions. Overall, no AR model was found to significantly impact changes in attributions or performance more than another model. Participants’ open-ended explanations for success and failure suggested that individuals were affected by the intervention to varying degrees. Relationships were found between performance and attributions, particularly with respect to internality, stability, and globality. Implications of this research are that competitors may benefit from AR to learn adaptive ways to explain performance, as long as the intervention is designed to complement their needs and attributional tendencies. Also, athletes may be able to develop skills to translate causal explanations for unsuccessful experiences into positive outcomes. Suggestions for future research include testing the utility of skills and techniques for AR in a meaningful environment and over a number of sessions. Specifically, following assessment of athletes’ causal attributions, interventions would be based on existing AR models and ideally occur both on and off the field throughout the competitive season." @default.
• W1510079046 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1510079046 creator A5021230670 @default.
• W1510079046 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W1510079046 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1510079046 title "Skills and techniques for attribution retraining (STAR)" @default.
• W1510079046 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W1510079046 type Work @default.
• W1510079046 sameAs 1510079046 @default.
• W1510079046 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1510079046 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1510079046 hasAuthorship W1510079046A5021230670 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C143299363 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C179034447 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2119116 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2778749631 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2779501167 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2779662365 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C2781054738 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C121332964 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C138496976 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C143299363 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C151730666 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C15744967 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C162324750 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C166957645 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C169760540 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C179034447 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C180747234 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C1862650 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2119116 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C26760741 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2778749631 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2779343474 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2779501167 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2779662365 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C2781054738 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C34447519 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C62520636 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C71924100 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C75630572 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C77805123 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C86803240 @default.
• W1510079046 hasConceptScore W1510079046C95457728 @default.
• W1510079046 hasLocation W15100790461 @default.
• W1510079046 hasOpenAccess W1510079046 @default.
• W1510079046 hasPrimaryLocation W15100790461 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W1972387414 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W1986299782 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W1996377706 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2034951852 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2041392709 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2049464173 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2072151178 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2096503747 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2098446487 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2107585835 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2114347949 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2117498111 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2125114659 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2189522090 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2265202320 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2523698157 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2590340941 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2970961837 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W2977710167 @default.
• W1510079046 hasRelatedWork W3158692542 @default.
• W1510079046 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1510079046 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1510079046 magId "1510079046" @default.
• W1510079046 workType "dissertation" @default.