FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1511717184> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1511717184 abstract "Amici curiae interventions are becoming commonplace in international dispute resolution. Nevertheless, relevant international relations and international law scholarship on international judicial decision-making so far has overlooked this trend. The role of amici curiae has yet to be conceptualized. This paper argues that amici curiae interventions play an influential role in international judicial decision-making. By analyzing amici curiae participation in cases related to the right to property within the European Convention, this paper explains the basic tenets of amicus participation, their modes of knowledge production, as well as the ways through which the Court engages with and is influenced by amici. There are five types of amici interveners: 1.individuals, 2. NGOs, 3. international organizations, 4. states, and 5.national independent statutory bodies. They influence judicial decision-making, primarily, through practices of knowledge production. I define “knowledge production practice” as a systematic practice of assigning meaning to information. Amici interventions engage in two disparate modes of knowledge production, which I call here “activist” and “expert” modes. In the activist mode, intervening entities make a claim in the realm of de lege ferenda, what the law should be. The amici formulate a “constitutive claim”, a claim about a new factual reality that necessitates development of new international law and principles. However, most amici engage in an expert mode of knowledge production. This mode misses a larger constitutive claim about the changed reality in relation to which new law needs to be developed. In the expert mode the amici support a resolution of a particular case in relation to one of the sides, the applicant or the respondent. Amici present factual information and research and argue about how the law should be applied to the facts as understood in the context of the submitted research. However, in the “expert” mode the intervening entities make claims in the realm of de lex lata, of what the law is, and not in the sphere of de lege ferenda. In doing so, the interveners marshal information and evidence from domestic jurisdictions, and make claims on how the existing international law should apply to these facts.The Court engages with the amici in three specific ways: acknowledgment, refutation, and corroboration. Almost all amici interventions are acknowledged. In certain cases, the Court engages specifically with arguments put forth by amici, including with their claims de lege ferenda, and explains why it cannot share amici’s arguments. In the mode of corroboration, however, the Court expressly relies on the evidence put forth by amici in the expert mode." @default.
• W1511717184 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1511717184 creator A5047863553 @default.
• W1511717184 date "2013-03-24" @default.
• W1511717184 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1511717184 title "Making International Property Law: The Role of Amici Curiae in International Judicial Decision-Making" @default.
• W1511717184 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1511717184 type Work @default.
• W1511717184 sameAs 1511717184 @default.
• W1511717184 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1511717184 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1511717184 hasAuthorship W1511717184A5047863553 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C2776713681 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C144024400 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C158129432 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C17744445 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C190253527 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C199539241 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C2776713681 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C2778061430 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C34974158 @default.
• W1511717184 hasConceptScore W1511717184C94625758 @default.
• W1511717184 hasLocation W15117171841 @default.
• W1511717184 hasOpenAccess W1511717184 @default.
• W1511717184 hasPrimaryLocation W15117171841 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1488108104 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1544908534 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1629992338 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1681820069 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1801968463 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W1978599820 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2000112717 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2035524587 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2059398959 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2107692324 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2121665806 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2146171544 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2154590969 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2188829549 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2244010378 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2292527914 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2609566953 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W2950979037 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W47053147 @default.
• W1511717184 hasRelatedWork W846421071 @default.
• W1511717184 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1511717184 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1511717184 magId "1511717184" @default.
• W1511717184 workType "article" @default.