FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1514709427> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1514709427 abstract "<p>This thesis seeks to determine what monitoring will measure the effectiveness of public funding for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity on private land in New Zealand. To establish this, four questions have been asked: Is monitoring of biodiversity change on private land a requirement to provide information for biodiversity status reports? With biodiversity loss such a critical world issue, New Zealand has committed to its protection along with many other nations. The country's obligations and strategies for protecting, monitoring and reporting biodiversity change on private land are provided. Current reporting practices are critiqued and conclude that key data are not being collected and that private land is not well covered. As a result, biodiversity reports include very little biodiversity outcome data from private land. Are there are a core group of biodiversity monitoring methods suitable for landowners to measure the success of their conservation actions and to measure improvements to biodiversity on their land? 19 landowners and monitors who are engaged in conservation work and biodiversity outcome monitoring on private land have been interviewed in 12 case studies. These landowners and monitors are using 31 different monitoring methods. The methods have been assessed to see how landowners use the data and assessed against a set of criteria to determine their suitability. A core group of nine biodiversity monitoring methods emerge as the most useful in these cases. Do agencies which fund biodiversity protection and enhancement on private land need to measure the success of their funding initiatives? 18 agencies have given funds to these 12 case studies to support the conservation of some of the country's most threatened and endangered species, ecosystems and habitats that are found on their land. Results show that few quantitative indicators are used to measure improvements to biodiversity which may result from these grants. This research suggests ways for agencies which fund biodiversity protection on private land to measure the success of their funding initiatives so the effectiveness of these funds can be assessed. What biodiversity information do landowners need in order to make decisions about management on their land and to inform agencies which have funded biodiversity conservation on their land? The monitoring methods in use by landowners are considered in terms of their suitability to inform land management decisions and to inform funding agencies of the outcomes of the funds. This leads to a recommended core group of methods that can meet the needs of both parties. The research found that monitoring is as much a social event as a scientific exercise. Landowners found the social resources they needed to support their monitoring included having others to work with, having others to talk to like mentors, financial support, getting rewards from their monitoring results and gaining confidence to give it a go. All landowners and monitors identified barriers to monitoring they had to overcome, and these are discussed. This thesis recommends a list of core monitoring methods that are suitable for landowners to measure progress towards their biodiversity goals, improvements to biodiversity and can assist with land management decisions. They can also be used by funding agencies to judge the effectiveness of their funding towards the protection and enhancement of biodiversity on private land in New Zealand. This investigation highlights eight issues with funding goals, biodiversity monitoring and reporting on private land and provides 17 recommendations to address the issues. With 70% of New Zealand in private ownership, it is vital that landowners understand how their land contributes to the survival of native vegetation, habitats, ecosystems, species and their genes, which live on their land. The landowners in these 12 cases understand. They undertake conservation work and biodiversity monitoring, which demonstrates that landowners could provide information and evidence to measure the effectiveness of public funding for biodiversity protection on their land. These kiwi landowners are counting kiwis, and other biodiversity indicators, to measure the effect of their conservation work and its impact on restoring New Zealand's unique flora and fauna.</p>" @default.
• W1514709427 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1514709427 creator A5055155473 @default.
• W1514709427 date "2021-11-08" @default.
• W1514709427 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1514709427 title "Kiwis Counting Kiwis: Biodiversity Monitoring on Private Land in New Zealand" @default.
• W1514709427 cites W115394847 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1486673533 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1487899538 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1509113417 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1527311855 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1556236940 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1567084746 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1577489397 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1853457525 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1972337711 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W1982923500 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2007524031 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2011563921 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2013731757 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2016538450 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2023924444 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2037503630 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2040609079 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2042288996 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2055953874 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2060900938 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2084324412 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2093510295 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2097057889 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2101280078 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2103317434 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2104017557 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2115943116 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2123419589 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2124696785 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2129775337 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2138341218 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2145436606 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2147956888 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2153820558 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2158704144 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2160537686 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2163054910 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2166531991 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2171148471 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2186259033 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2257343722 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2279289731 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2403122024 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W2912615433 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W3010621220 @default.
• W1514709427 cites W3186313703 @default.
• W1514709427 doi "https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.16947286.v1" @default.
• W1514709427 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W1514709427 type Work @default.
• W1514709427 sameAs 1514709427 @default.
• W1514709427 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1514709427 countsByYear W15147094272021 @default.
• W1514709427 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1514709427 hasAuthorship W1514709427A5055155473 @default.
• W1514709427 hasBestOaLocation W15147094271 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C4792198 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C107826830 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C127413603 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C130217890 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C144133560 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C18762648 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C18903297 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C205649164 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C39432304 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C4792198 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C78519656 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C86803240 @default.
• W1514709427 hasConceptScore W1514709427C91375879 @default.
• W1514709427 hasLocation W15147094271 @default.
• W1514709427 hasLocation W15147094272 @default.
• W1514709427 hasOpenAccess W1514709427 @default.
• W1514709427 hasPrimaryLocation W15147094271 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W1038143047 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W1511319734 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W1580636684 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2067793780 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2144943352 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2354520057 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2925201626 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2982206102 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W3182761151 @default.
• W1514709427 hasRelatedWork W2184143727 @default.

• next