FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1516857996> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1516857996 endingPage "83" @default.
• W1516857996 startingPage "76" @default.
• W1516857996 abstract "Background: The recent controversies on the pages of the JMDE regarding UNDP evaluations, as well as the DAC criteria, are discussed in the light of two UNDP/GEF evaluations in Latin America for which the author was primarily responsible.Purpose: The author defends the utilization of all five evaluation criteria of the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD (the DAC criteria), and their integration via Theories of Change.Setting: The pine/oak forest of Honduras and the mangrove regions along the coast of Brazil.Intervention: Two projects of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), with the respective governments.Research Design: Mid-term evaluations with site visits and interviews.Data Collection and Analysis: In the Brazilian case, longitudinal analysis of available data was conducted and related to the findings of the interviews and observation, as well as published reports and studies. A Theory of Change (action model) of the Honduran project was structured and graphically portrayed based on desk review of the project document and other documentation, adapted following initial interviews, and field tested.Findings: In Brazil, preliminary evidence derived in part from Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) questions with reference to results indicates a relative lack of project effectiveness and of preliminary signs of impact. The state of Pará offers one possible exception, related in part to the fact that a certain momentum had already been built up in that state prior to project start-up and in part to the early adoption through the project of a new method of transportation of the fiddler crab (Ucides cordatus), in baskets covered with wet sponges rather than in sacks. The Honduran project, with the strong support of the national government and the UNDP field office as well as GEF, successfully adapted the provisions of the project document to pursue a more community- and community organization-centered approach, rather than relying on the outside consultants originally specified. Project-supported gathering of impact data raised environmental awareness, strengthened the local university and established a baseline for future ex-post impact evaluation. Keywords: Theory of Change; DAC criteria; capacity development; displacement of goals; UNDP/GEF." @default.
• W1516857996 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1516857996 creator A5044696552 @default.
• W1516857996 date "2015-03-09" @default.
• W1516857996 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W1516857996 title "Relating Outputs, Outcomes and Impact in the Evaluation of International Development Projects" @default.
• W1516857996 doi "https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v11i24.424" @default.
• W1516857996 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1516857996 type Work @default.
• W1516857996 sameAs 1516857996 @default.
• W1516857996 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1516857996 countsByYear W15168579962023 @default.
• W1516857996 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1516857996 hasAuthorship W1516857996A5044696552 @default.
• W1516857996 hasBestOaLocation W15168579961 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C158886217 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C2776545233 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C107826830 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C133462117 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C144024400 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C158886217 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C161191863 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C17744445 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C199360897 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C199539241 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C2776545233 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C36289849 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C39432304 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C41008148 @default.
• W1516857996 hasConceptScore W1516857996C56666940 @default.
• W1516857996 hasIssue "24" @default.
• W1516857996 hasLocation W15168579961 @default.
• W1516857996 hasOpenAccess W1516857996 @default.
• W1516857996 hasPrimaryLocation W15168579961 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W1745080662 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2034223907 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2091679425 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2219174994 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2322015894 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W254849516 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W348497774 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W4248533007 @default.
• W1516857996 hasRelatedWork W2176807503 @default.
• W1516857996 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W1516857996 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1516857996 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1516857996 magId "1516857996" @default.
• W1516857996 workType "article" @default.