FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W15178538> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W15178538 endingPage "70" @default.
• W15178538 startingPage "49" @default.
• W15178538 abstract "The practice of evaluation has existed in one form or another for as long as one can remember and is central to all processes of learning. Today, evaluation is a popular concept grouping together multiple and diverse realities. This article aims to propose a conceptual framework for evaluation that is broad and universal enough to allow all those concerned with evaluation of health services (regardless of their disciplines and interests) to better understand each other, to perform better evaluations, and to use them in a more pertinent manner. We will begin by defining evaluation as the process which consists of making a judgement on the value of an intervention by implementing a system which can provide scientifically valid and socially legitimate information on regarding this particular intervention (or any of its components) to the different stakeholders concerned, such that they can form an opinion from their perspective on the intervention and reach a judgement which can translate into action. We define intervention as any organized system of action (a structure, actors and their practices, processes of action, one or many finalities and an environment) aiming to, in a given environment, during a given time period, modify the foreseeable course of a phenomenon to correct a problematic situation. An intervention can be a technique, a medication, a treatment, an organisation, a program, a policy or even a complex system like the health care system. Various interventions, regardless of their nature, can be the object of two types of evaluation. Normative evaluation is based on appreciation of each component of the intervention according to criteria and standards. This type of evaluation is defined as an activity which consists of making a judgement regarding an intervention by comparing the resources utilized and their organisation (structure); services and goods produced (process) and results obtained to criteria and standards (in other words, summaries of what is good and right). Did the intervention correspond to what should have been done according to the standards utilized? Evaluative research aims to employ valid scientific methods to analyze relationships between different components of an intervention. More specifically, evaluation research can be classified into six types of analysis, which employ different research strategies. Strategic analysis allows appreciation of the pertinence of an intervention; logical analysis, the soundness of the theoretical and operational bases of the intervention; productivity analysis, the technical efficiency with which resources are mobilized to produce goods or services; analysis of effects, effectiveness of goods and services in producing results; efficiency analysis, relations between the costs of the resources (or the services) used and the results; implementation analysis, appreciation of interactions between the process of the intervention and the context of implementation in the production of effects. The official finalities of all evaluation processes are of four types: (1)strategic, to aid the planning and development of an intervention, (2) formative, to supply information to improve an intervention in progress, (3) summative, to determine the effects of an intervention (to decide if it should be maintained, transformed or suspended), (4) fundamental, to contribute to the advancement of empirical and theoretical knowledge regarding the intervention. In addition, experience acquired in the field of evaluation suggests that evaluation is also productive in that it allows actors, in an organized setting, to reconsider the links between the objectives given, practices developed and their context of action. This task of achieving coherence is continuous and is one of the intrinsic conditions of action in an organized setting. In this perspective, evaluation can have a key role, given that it is not employed to legitimize new forms of control but rather to favor debate and th" @default.
• W15178538 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W15178538 creator A5017970648 @default.
• W15178538 creator A5027190234 @default.
• W15178538 creator A5051054941 @default.
• W15178538 creator A5081723297 @default.
• W15178538 date "2018-01-24" @default.
• W15178538 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W15178538 title "2. L’évaluation dans le domaine de la santé : concepts et méthodes" @default.
• W15178538 doi "https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pum.6300" @default.
• W15178538 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11148425" @default.
• W15178538 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W15178538 type Work @default.
• W15178538 sameAs 15178538 @default.
• W15178538 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382012 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382013 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382014 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382016 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382017 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382018 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382020 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382021 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382022 @default.
• W15178538 countsByYear W151785382023 @default.
• W15178538 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W15178538 hasAuthorship W15178538A5017970648 @default.
• W15178538 hasAuthorship W15178538A5027190234 @default.
• W15178538 hasAuthorship W15178538A5051054941 @default.
• W15178538 hasAuthorship W15178538A5081723297 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C168167062 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C2781238097 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C50335755 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W15178538 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C111472728 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C111919701 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C112930515 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C119857082 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C121332964 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C12713177 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C127413603 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C138885662 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C154945302 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C160735492 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C168167062 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C17744445 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C199539241 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C2776291640 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C2776548248 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C2780791683 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C2781238097 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C41008148 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C44725695 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C50335755 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C539667460 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C56739046 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C62520636 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C71924100 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C97355855 @default.
• W15178538 hasConceptScore W15178538C98045186 @default.
• W15178538 hasLocation W151785381 @default.
• W15178538 hasLocation W151785382 @default.
• W15178538 hasOpenAccess W15178538 @default.
• W15178538 hasPrimaryLocation W151785381 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W1973916383 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W1978910828 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W1991424569 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W1996341160 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2016067960 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2017267853 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2039616261 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2138109543 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2414579841 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2608851611 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W2970474018 @default.
• W15178538 hasRelatedWork W3029109062 @default.

• next