FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1520281423> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1520281423 abstract "Medical Academia Conflict of Interest Policy and Potential Impact on Research Funding by Michael K. Maahs MPA, Troy University, 1993 BA, Ripon College, 1990 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration Walden University July 2015 Abstract The partnership between medical academia and the pharmaceutical industry has been scrutinized for issues associated with research bias. As a result of this scrutiny, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued policy recommendations in 2009 directing academia to adopt comprehensive conflict of interest (COI) policies. During the same time, a slowdown of funded research into academia occurred, and it is not clear whether the IOM recommendations contributed to this problem. The purpose of this case study was to determine the extent to which compliance with the IOM policy resulted in a reduction in funded research. The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) was the theoretical lens used for study. COI policy statements (n = 15) were analyzed from American Association of Medical Colleges member schools that engage in medical research. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with 4 medical academic researchers. Data were inductively coded and organized around key themes. Key findings indicated that medical academia is compliant with IOM recommendations and COI policies did not appear to have a direct effect on research placement by industry. Interestingly, a possible explanation for reductions in industry funding relate to inefficient institutional review board processes. Additionally, the ACF construct wasThe partnership between medical academia and the pharmaceutical industry has been scrutinized for issues associated with research bias. As a result of this scrutiny, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued policy recommendations in 2009 directing academia to adopt comprehensive conflict of interest (COI) policies. During the same time, a slowdown of funded research into academia occurred, and it is not clear whether the IOM recommendations contributed to this problem. The purpose of this case study was to determine the extent to which compliance with the IOM policy resulted in a reduction in funded research. The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) was the theoretical lens used for study. COI policy statements (n = 15) were analyzed from American Association of Medical Colleges member schools that engage in medical research. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with 4 medical academic researchers. Data were inductively coded and organized around key themes. Key findings indicated that medical academia is compliant with IOM recommendations and COI policies did not appear to have a direct effect on research placement by industry. Interestingly, a possible explanation for reductions in industry funding relate to inefficient institutional review board processes. Additionally, the ACF construct was validated via an observed complex and slowly evolving COI policy process. The positive social change implications of this study include recommendations to academia to continue to monitor and report on COI and explore efficiency improvements related to IRB oversight in order to support important pharmaceutical research that ultimately improves the health and wellbeing of people. Medical Academia Conflict of Interest Policy and Potential Impact on Research Funding by Michael K. Maahs MPA, Troy University, 1993 BA, Ripon College, 1990 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration – Health Services Walden University July 2015 Dedication I would like to dedicate this work to my children, Alexandra, Katherine, Elizabeth, and Matthew, for being a source of inspiration and having made me reflect on how important education is and the implications for making the world a better place, and to my wife Maria: Your support and helping push me along has allowed me to accomplish this work. Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge several people for their assistance with this project. I would like to thank Darlene Wesenberg Rzezotarski for being my APA style and grammar editor. Also, I would like to thank Dr. Kirk Yancy Williams for being an effective chair for my dissertation and for all of his advice along the way. He helped inspire me to create a timely and significant body of work with this study. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. LaToya Johnson and Dr. Anne Fetter for all their hard work and their individual instruction. Table of" @default.
• W1520281423 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1520281423 creator A5003910367 @default.
• W1520281423 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W1520281423 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1520281423 title "Medical Academia Conflict of Interest Policy and Potential Impact on Research Funding" @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1515036358 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1542077694 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1543190038 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1963885493 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1966857406 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1973547530 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1974648888 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W1982903935 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2007175319 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2028339881 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2030161453 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2030881336 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2040177939 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2053747403 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2067516463 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2076751598 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2080218276 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2085367214 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2134625507 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2144661592 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W3144127399 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W2520073598 @default.
• W1520281423 cites W3162912899 @default.
• W1520281423 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1520281423 type Work @default.
• W1520281423 sameAs 1520281423 @default.
• W1520281423 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1520281423 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1520281423 hasAuthorship W1520281423A5003910367 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C106977388 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C2777276634 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C2779652045 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C71750763 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C106977388 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C142724271 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C17744445 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C199539241 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C2776050585 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C2777276634 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C2779652045 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C3116431 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C39549134 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C71750763 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C71924100 @default.
• W1520281423 hasConceptScore W1520281423C98274493 @default.
• W1520281423 hasLocation W15202814231 @default.
• W1520281423 hasOpenAccess W1520281423 @default.
• W1520281423 hasPrimaryLocation W15202814231 @default.
• W1520281423 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1520281423 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1520281423 magId "1520281423" @default.
• W1520281423 workType "article" @default.