FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1520378087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1520378087 abstract "Social policy evaluations usually use classical statistical methods, which may, for example, compare outcomes for program and comparison groups and determine whether the estimated differences (or impacts) are statistically significant — meaning they are unlikely to have been generated by a program with no effect. This approach has two important shortcomings. First, it is geared toward testing hypotheses regarding specific possible program effects — most commonly, whether a program has zero effect. It is difficult with this framework to test a hypothesis that, say, the program’s estimated impact is larger than 10 (whether 10 percentage points, $10, or some other measure). Second, readers often view results through the lens of their own expectations. A program developer may interpret results positively even if they are not statistically significant — that is, they do not confirm the program’s effectiveness — while a skeptic might interpret with caution statistically significant impact estimates that do not follow theoretical expectations. This paper uses Bayesian methods — an alternative to classical statistics — to reanalyze results from three studies in the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ (HtE) Demonstration and Evaluation Project, which is testing interventions to increase employment and reduce welfare dependency for low-income adults with serious barriers to employment. In interpreting new data from a social policy evaluation, a Bayesian analysis formally incorporates prior beliefs, or expectations (known as “priors”), about the social policy into the statistical analysis and characterizes results in terms of the distribution of possible effects, instead of whether the effects are consistent with a true effect of zero. The main question addressed in the paper is whether a Bayesian approach tends to confirm or contradict published results. Results of the Bayesian analysis generally confirm the published findings that impacts from the three HtE programs examined here tend to be small. This is in part because results for the three sites are broadly consistent with findings from similar studies, but in part because each of the sites included a relatively large sample. The Bayesian framework may be more informative when applied to smaller studies that might not be expected to provide statistically significant impact estimates on their own." @default.
• W1520378087 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1520378087 creator A5070667028 @default.
• W1520378087 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1520378087 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1520378087 title "A Bayesian Reanalysis of Results from the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project" @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1482736186 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1486971838 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1511594665 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1528364089 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1543239933 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1586303580 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1975972867 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1991058132 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W1997562313 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2003470082 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2006411865 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2019910157 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2020692132 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2034731753 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2045656233 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2047011180 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2064798601 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2078355289 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2102228452 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2117912384 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2127441549 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2127812609 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2140399272 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2147096914 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2153346711 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2161291623 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2166349017 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2166489011 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2172128464 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2183119828 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2188825068 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2203232333 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2279754378 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2331384579 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2339634127 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2789979531 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2914142970 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W3122550675 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W341600478 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W76135659 @default.
• W1520378087 cites W2161237128 @default.
• W1520378087 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2116772" @default.
• W1520378087 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1520378087 type Work @default.
• W1520378087 sameAs 1520378087 @default.
• W1520378087 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1520378087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1520378087 hasAuthorship W1520378087A5070667028 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C101112237 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C107673813 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C160234255 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C177769412 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConcept C87007009 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C101112237 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C105795698 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C107673813 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C111472728 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C138885662 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C149782125 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C151730666 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C154945302 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C15744967 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C160234255 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C162118730 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C162324750 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C177769412 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C18296254 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C2777267654 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C2780876879 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C33923547 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C41008148 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C542102704 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C86803240 @default.
• W1520378087 hasConceptScore W1520378087C87007009 @default.
• W1520378087 hasLocation W15203780871 @default.
• W1520378087 hasOpenAccess W1520378087 @default.
• W1520378087 hasPrimaryLocation W15203780871 @default.
• W1520378087 hasRelatedWork W1522018746 @default.

• next