FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1520421655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1520421655 abstract "The idea to publish scoping and systematic reviews1,2 in wiki format is exciting and the authors and the journals editors are to be congratulated in being at the frontiers of journal publishing. However, I cannot help but raise questions about the pitfalls in such a process. In teaching history (of sport, health and physical education) in a kinesiology faculty, I have been forced to engage with wikis since my students love them and frequently turn to the granddaddy, Wikipedia, as their first source of information. There are clear issues that should be considered here.Obviously the editors of Open Medicine have thought much of this through. Opening an article to contributors beyond verified experts does, as they suggest, have the potential to bring in more participants and different and useful forms of knowledge. However, a large community of contributors seems to be required for wikis to maintain a level of information quality3, and we have examples where those involved in wikis have become disenchanted with the process – Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger left to establish other web-based encyclopedias (Nupedia, Citizendium) in which expert opinion could have more prominence.4Vandalism and innocent mistakes are frequently raised as wiki-related problems.5,6Open Medicine’s editors have instituted a process of requiring contributors to state their name, affiliation and competing interests to ensure responsibility for edits. It seems though, that despite this well-intentioned policy, there is little to stop someone from declaring themselves as “Dr. Joe Schmo of the Podunk Institute” and making whatever edits they want. In the context of medical reviews as wikis, I am less worried about vandalism (which is easily detectable) than innocent mistakes. Research on wikis shows that vandalism is typically reverted quite quickly, but that plausibly-sounding mistakes last much longer, in some cases for months.7 Furthermore, as we are all well aware, even at its best, medicine can be sometimes quite inexact. Despite all of the science and evidence-based practice, we often cannot explain why one case in 100 is spontaneously cured, or why what works 99 times does not for patient #100. Wikis, by their very nature, offer the potential for extreme circumstances and people to be given the same gravity as the more normal case.In addition, there is my main problem with wikis as a source-obsessed historian, which is also relevant to medicine. On open wikis, even if the information is usually very good, there is no guarantee about any particular version that a person is consulting at any given time. This, and all of the issues mentioned above, seem to me to be particularly dangerous if it is medical knowledge that is open access and open edit. In the case of most good wikis, mechanisms evolve to try to ensure quality and reliability. The journal’s editors have instituted a tracking process with the authors as a first step, which is very sound. I am excited to see how this project will evolve, and wish the journal the best of luck in wiki-ing forward." @default.
• W1520421655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1520421655 creator A5057913252 @default.
• W1520421655 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W1520421655 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1520421655 title "Medi-wiki worries?" @default.
• W1520421655 cites W1508978328 @default.
• W1520421655 cites W1535926307 @default.
• W1520421655 cites W2138334256 @default.
• W1520421655 cites W2144524731 @default.
• W1520421655 cites W3122541586 @default.
• W1520421655 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3090120" @default.
• W1520421655 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21603048" @default.
• W1520421655 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1520421655 type Work @default.
• W1520421655 sameAs 1520421655 @default.
• W1520421655 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1520421655 countsByYear W15204216552017 @default.
• W1520421655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1520421655 hasAuthorship W1520421655A5057913252 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C148863701 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C108827166 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C136764020 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C148863701 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C151719136 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C161191863 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C17744445 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C199539241 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C39549134 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C41008148 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C41458344 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C509550671 @default.
• W1520421655 hasConceptScore W1520421655C71924100 @default.
• W1520421655 hasLocation W15204216551 @default.
• W1520421655 hasOpenAccess W1520421655 @default.
• W1520421655 hasPrimaryLocation W15204216551 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W1483583667 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W1850986777 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W1968995905 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W1986407459 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2000857952 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2004192355 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2013111055 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2018719839 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2019319117 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2059512026 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2080013858 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2089214552 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2092579923 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2093703754 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2097433790 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2168021003 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2303324797 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W3120899741 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2095099093 @default.
• W1520421655 hasRelatedWork W2107256544 @default.
• W1520421655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1520421655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1520421655 magId "1520421655" @default.
• W1520421655 workType "article" @default.