FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1520491944> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1520491944 endingPage "363" @default.
• W1520491944 startingPage "345" @default.
• W1520491944 abstract "Although strategic alignment is an important theoretical concept, and achieving alignment or fit among organizational elements would seem to be an important business objective, empirical demonstrations of the importance of alignment have been uncommon (White 1986). This study attempted to provide an empirical assessment of the nature and importance of information systems strategic alignlnent There is much discussion today about the importance of 1. THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL strategic alignment in general (e.g., Venkatraman and Camillus 1984; White 1986) and information systems (IS) The conceptual model underlying the study is depicted in strategic alignment in particular (e.g., Elam et al. 1988; Figure 1. It depicts the propositions that IS.strategic Henderson and Thomas 1992; Henderson and Venkatraman 1992; Keen 1991; Ward, Griffiths and Whitmore 1990). alignment, defined as the fit existing between business The discussion generally suggests that the better the alignstrategy and IS strategy, impacts performance at the IS ment, the better the expected company performance. level and at the overall business level. However, there have been few empirical verifications of this proposition (White 1986). In addition, the discussion The results of the overall study, and detailed descriptions of about alignment has tended to be imprecise and vague (Van the instruments used to measure business strategy, IS de Ven and Drazin 1985). Important objectives of this strategy, IS effectiveness and business performance, have study were to identify a useful, precise model for the IS been described in Chan et al. (1993) and Chan and Huff strategic alignment construct and to examine empirically (1992) respectively. (Table 1 provides a brief outline of relationships among IS strategic alignment; IS effectiveness, the overall study.) This paper discusses the derivation and and business performance. significance of the IS strategic alignment computations and The discussion opens with a brief overview of the concepthe study's findings regarding alignment tual model underlying this study. Next, instruments that measure business strategy and IS strategy are introduced. Then instruments that measure IS effectiveness and business performance are outlined. This is followed by a 2. MEASURING BUSINESS STRATEGY AND general discussion of various approaches that are used to INFORMATION SYSTEMS STRATEGY assess alignment. Specific models of alignment are evaluated and the primary model for IS strategic alignment used within this research is selected and described. The links In order to assess IS strategic alignment, there needed to be between IS strategic alignment and performance are then assessments of both business strategy and IS strategy. discussed. Finally, the paper concludes with a description Table 2 lists the dimensions of these constructs as operaof the study's implications for management and future tionalized in this study. Multiple indicators were used to research. measure each dimension." @default.
• W1520491944 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1520491944 creator A5081402068 @default.
• W1520491944 creator A5087152800 @default.
• W1520491944 date "1993-01-01" @default.
• W1520491944 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1520491944 title "INVESTIGATING INFORMATION SYSTEMS STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT" @default.
• W1520491944 cites W1495154560 @default.
• W1520491944 cites W1543020260 @default.
• W1520491944 cites W2118388452 @default.
• W1520491944 cites W3006237773 @default.
• W1520491944 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W1520491944 type Work @default.
• W1520491944 sameAs 1520491944 @default.
• W1520491944 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W1520491944 countsByYear W15204919442012 @default.
• W1520491944 countsByYear W15204919442013 @default.
• W1520491944 countsByYear W15204919442014 @default.
• W1520491944 countsByYear W15204919442015 @default.
• W1520491944 countsByYear W15204919442016 @default.
• W1520491944 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W1520491944 hasAuthorship W1520491944A5081402068 @default.
• W1520491944 hasAuthorship W1520491944A5087152800 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C108578832 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C129011618 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C2777152325 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C29848774 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C48243021 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C65986115 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConcept C86275758 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C105795698 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C108578832 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C111472728 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C119599485 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C120936955 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C127413603 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C129011618 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C138885662 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C162324750 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C180198813 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C187736073 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C199360897 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C2777152325 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C2780801425 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C29848774 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C33923547 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C41008148 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C48243021 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C539667460 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C56739046 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C65986115 @default.
• W1520491944 hasConceptScore W1520491944C86275758 @default.
• W1520491944 hasLocation W15204919441 @default.
• W1520491944 hasOpenAccess W1520491944 @default.
• W1520491944 hasPrimaryLocation W15204919441 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W145235907 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1484719273 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1487557448 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1509331330 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1528830218 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1578671095 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1587127932 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1680962750 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1968381288 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1990126808 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W1994146145 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2037894668 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2040402811 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2048178097 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2057012437 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2107604945 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2117296855 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2123378202 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2141898774 @default.
• W1520491944 hasRelatedWork W2161298421 @default.
• W1520491944 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1520491944 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1520491944 magId "1520491944" @default.
• W1520491944 workType "article" @default.