Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1520806063> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 100 of
100
with 100 items per page.
- W1520806063 endingPage "100" @default.
- W1520806063 startingPage "95" @default.
- W1520806063 abstract "Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has evolved as the procurement method of choice for living kidney donation. Given that this is a technically challenging procedure with potential risks for the healthy donor, skills transfer from an experienced laparoscopist to a novice is critical. The present study investigates donor and recipient outcomes during a novice's early experience with this procedure. Previous training in laparoscopic renal surgery and mentoring by the expert helps the novice to generate acceptable outcomes. However, longer warm ischaemia times during the learning phase may affect short-term graft function. Objective To test the effect of surgeon experience on donor and recipient outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN). Results of a LLDN expert were compared with those of an LLDN novice. Patients and Methods Between October 2008 and October 2010 the last 20 cases of a series of 130 consecutive LLDNs, performed by an expert (EXP) were compared with the first 20 cases of an LLDN novice (NOV). Donor and recipient outcomes were evaluated. The novice was mentored by the expert during his initial four LLDN cases. Results Donor and recipient demographics were not different between the two surgeon groups. Total operating time and warm ischaemia time during LLDN was significantly longer in the NOV group compared with the EXP group (273 min vs 147 min and 213 s vs 162 s, respectively). The incidence of donor complications was low in both groups. Length of hospital stay among donors did not differ between groups. Although delayed graft function, rejection rates and postoperative serum creatinine levels indicated slightly poorer recipient outcomes in the NOV group, differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Mentoring by an experienced urological laparoscopist may help an LLDN novice to generate acceptable donor and recipient outcomes. Whether or not prolonged operating times and warm ischaemia times during the early phase of an LLDN experience are risk factors for impaired graft function needs further evaluation. Citing Literature Volume111, Issue1January 2013Pages 95-100 RelatedInformation" @default.
- W1520806063 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5000710774 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5006846469 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5017015998 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5019213299 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5021087419 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5048386880 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5050122377 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5058789818 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5068778197 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5072750163 @default.
- W1520806063 creator A5087915335 @default.
- W1520806063 date "2012-07-03" @default.
- W1520806063 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1520806063 title "Outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of expertise" @default.
- W1520806063 cites W1967233264 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W1981868145 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W1982153568 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W1995048414 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W1998450073 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2005813964 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2018596452 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2026690780 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2028622043 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2038496985 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2041814364 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2042371182 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2064256691 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2076553696 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2089017846 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2094516030 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2098971598 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2143459343 @default.
- W1520806063 cites W2293573856 @default.
- W1520806063 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11348.x" @default.
- W1520806063 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22757693" @default.
- W1520806063 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1520806063 type Work @default.
- W1520806063 sameAs 1520806063 @default.
- W1520806063 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632014 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632015 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632016 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632018 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632019 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632020 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632021 @default.
- W1520806063 countsByYear W15208060632023 @default.
- W1520806063 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5000710774 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5006846469 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5017015998 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5019213299 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5021087419 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5048386880 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5050122377 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5058789818 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5068778197 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5072750163 @default.
- W1520806063 hasAuthorship W1520806063A5087915335 @default.
- W1520806063 hasBestOaLocation W15208060631 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C2775933685 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C126322002 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C141071460 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C162324750 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C2775933685 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C2780091579 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C2780227381 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C50522688 @default.
- W1520806063 hasConceptScore W1520806063C71924100 @default.
- W1520806063 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1520806063 hasLocation W15208060631 @default.
- W1520806063 hasLocation W15208060632 @default.
- W1520806063 hasOpenAccess W1520806063 @default.
- W1520806063 hasPrimaryLocation W15208060631 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W1983295021 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2041660778 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
- W1520806063 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W1520806063 hasVolume "111" @default.
- W1520806063 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1520806063 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1520806063 magId "1520806063" @default.
- W1520806063 workType "article" @default.