FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W152088320> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W152088320 abstract "hat would policy analysis look like if we were to begin with assumptions of multivocality and incommensurability, rather than discover them in midst of analytic research? Much interpretive policy analysis begins and ends by arguing on philosophical grounds with positivist presuppositions of field. Reflecting on organizational and other realities of multiple meanings that emerged during my own field work, I raise some of theoretical and conceptual issues that interpretive analyses engage, concluding that such analysis would have to be conducted under demands of passionate humility. PASSIONATE HUMILITY IN INTERPRETIVE POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYSIS The whole point of a semiotic approach to culture is...to aid us in gaining access to conceptual world in which our live so that we can, in some extended sense of term, converse with them. Clifford Geertz (1973, p. 24) Much of what has been written and published in last 10-15 years on interpretive policy and implementation analysis begins and ends by arguing on philosophical grounds with positivist presuppositions of field.1 My starting point here is that we are beyond need to argue for interpretive approaches to policy analysis. The question that concerns me in this essay is, What if we were to start our research (and other practices) with assumptions of multivocality and incommensurability (rather than discover them in process)? I want to assume first part of Geertz's statement: need and therefore desire to gain access to conceptual worlds in which policy subjects live. How shall we do so? I wish to develop my argument inductively, building from field experience up to theoretical matters, with reference to my own work: an interpretive and reflective exercise. That makes me subject I am trying to converse with, which is a bit awkward. It is an enactment of what I am arguing, and also very pragmatic; and so I will proceed. ACCESSING CONCEPTUAL WORLDS I began an implementation study out of three years of participant-observation.2 I was in field at what might be called the point of program impact.3 Other interpretive studies of public policies also focus on action, whether legislative, implementory or evaluative.4 These studies typically compare statements (of intent) with actions-not only acts, but also language and physical artifacts used in those actions?working simultaneously with various meanings of policy. It is common in textbooks to find multiple definitions of policy, as a statement of intent, a reflection of accepted practice, and so on. These usages themselves reflect different points of time in an evolving policy process and different levels of action and their points of view. In this sense interpretive analysis shares with postmodern writing an appreciation for multiple and overlapping timings and situatedness of knowledge in action and in production. In field, various organizational and policy making levels become apparent: agency in its structural and interpersonal contexts of centrally-located" @default.
• W152088320 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W152088320 creator A5009780740 @default.
• W152088320 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W152088320 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W152088320 title "PASSIONATE HUMILITY IN INTERPRETIVE POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYSIS" @default.
• W152088320 cites W1512883400 @default.
• W152088320 cites W1606540910 @default.
• W152088320 cites W1973270880 @default.
• W152088320 cites W1984968616 @default.
• W152088320 cites W1990411506 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2008373375 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2013236998 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2021588093 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2075071068 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2118882740 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2127438306 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2127990384 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2262632229 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2320400310 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2337188481 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2527729900 @default.
• W152088320 cites W2798869504 @default.
• W152088320 cites W623995204 @default.
• W152088320 cites W9686387 @default.
• W152088320 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W152088320 type Work @default.
• W152088320 sameAs 152088320 @default.
• W152088320 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W152088320 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W152088320 hasAuthorship W152088320A5009780740 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C128706718 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C21190884 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C2777560498 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C2778456462 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C2778828898 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W152088320 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C111472728 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C128706718 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C138885662 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C144024400 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C17744445 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C185592680 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C199539241 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C202444582 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C21190884 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C2777560498 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C2778456462 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C2778828898 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C2780876879 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C33923547 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C55493867 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C9652623 @default.
• W152088320 hasConceptScore W152088320C98184364 @default.
• W152088320 hasLocation W1520883201 @default.
• W152088320 hasOpenAccess W152088320 @default.
• W152088320 hasPrimaryLocation W1520883201 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W1479033222 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W1495887735 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W1563811448 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W1581914377 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W170543862 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2006859135 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2098286333 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2312257838 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2328113163 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2471160986 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2501539667 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2761315553 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2766277442 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2905182857 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2905360257 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2909106188 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W2993013795 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W3124195132 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W3125368282 @default.
• W152088320 hasRelatedWork W42307175 @default.
• W152088320 isParatext "false" @default.
• W152088320 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W152088320 magId "152088320" @default.
• W152088320 workType "article" @default.