FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1521953619> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1521953619 endingPage "192" @default.
• W1521953619 startingPage "183" @default.
• W1521953619 abstract "The Catholic Historical Review VOL. LXXXVIAPRIL, 2000No. 2 THE CISTERCIANS AND THE GLOSSA ORDINARIA BY Constance B. Bouchard* The intellectual Renaissance of the twelfth century is usually seen as composed of two distinct strands. One strand was made up of the monastic love of learning, to use Jean Leclercq's phrase, most commonly presented as devoted almost entirely to a reading and contemplation steeped in traditions that went back to the early Middle Ages. The Cistercians, the major new monastic order of the twelfth century, may have differed from the black monks in many respects, including a greater emphasis on spiritual experience in their theology, but they were still Benedictines, and their overall approach to study and scholarship is assumed to have been fully within a traditional framework.1 The other strand in this paradigm, in contrast, was composed of the new scholasticlearning of the schools and the emerging universities,where texts were taken apart, critically analyzed, and discussed with the use of logic.2 It is to these schools of secular clergy, not to the monasteries, Dr. Bouchard is a professor of history in the University ofAkron. She presented a preliminary version of this paper at the Thirty-second International Congress on Medieval Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamzoo, in May, 1997. She acknowledges the help given her by Professors Karlfried Froehlich ofPrinceton Theological Seminary and E.Ann Matter of the University of Pennsylvania when she was beginning her study of the glossa ordinaria. Preliminary research was made possible by a fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, and a return trip to Troyes was funded by the University ofAkron Faculty Research Committee. Jean Leclercq, The Love ofLearning and the Desirefor God, trans. Catharine Misrahi (New York, 1961). David Knowles, The Monastic Order in Englandfrom the Time ofSt. Dunstan to the Fourth Lateran Council, 940-1216, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 211-212. Jean Leclercq, François Vandenbroucke, and Louis Bouyer, The Spirituality ofthe MiddleAges (A History of Christian Spirituality,Vol. 2 [New York, 1968]), pp. 187-242. M.-D. 183 184THE CISTERCIANS AND THE GLOSSA ORDINARIA that scholars have attributed the development in the middle of the twelfth century of the extensive commentaries on and analyses of the Bible, written in its margins and between its lines, which have collectively become known as the glossa ordinaria. This article will challenge this paradigm, which has been so widely accepted for over a generation that its underlying assumptions have never been re-examined.3 As I shall argue here, principally on the basis of glossed biblical manuscripts of the twelfth century, the history of the first fifty years of the glossa ordinaria indicates that the two main strands within twelfth-century thought, the monastic and the scholastic , were not as distinct as has often been thought. Specifically, I shall demonstrate that although the glossed books of the Bible in the early twelfth century were originally a product of the schools, much of their development and dissemination was due to the monks of the Cistercian order. And, even more importantly, the study of the glossa and the Cistercians together provides new insights into the intellectual advances of the twelfth century. Some preliminary comments on the nature of the glossa ordinaria are necessary. The idea of writing commentaries on books of the Bible is, of course, a very old one. In the West,Augustine's commentaries on a number of different books both laid the basis for much medieval theology and provided a model on which later commentators could develop their own exegesis. Commentaries by Origen and Gregory the Great on certain books of the Bible were also influential. Bede especially continued this tradition, three centuries after Augustine, by writing a number of his own commentaries on books of the Bible. By the Carolingian period , scholars such as Hrabanus Maurus were creating biblical comChenu , Nature, Man, and Society in the Twelfth Century, trans.Jerome Taylor and Lester K. Little (Chicago, 1968), pp. 270-309. 5A new biography of the Cistercians' most influential leader states categorically thathe had no affinity with Scholasticism; Adriaan H. Bredero, Bernard of Clairvaux: Between Cult and History (Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1996), p. 15.A similar assumption..." @default.
• W1521953619 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1521953619 creator A5034940270 @default.
• W1521953619 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W1521953619 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1521953619 title "The Cistercians and the Glossa Ordinaria" @default.
• W1521953619 cites W1533959014 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W1608434584 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W1984491233 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W1990608589 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W1998868741 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2015398115 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2040767793 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2065157602 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2075292985 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2119200812 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2136706784 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2171827128 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2473474808 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2621343198 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W2800605481 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W656602208 @default.
• W1521953619 cites W3035247317 @default.
• W1521953619 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2000.0163" @default.
• W1521953619 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W1521953619 type Work @default.
• W1521953619 sameAs 1521953619 @default.
• W1521953619 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1521953619 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1521953619 hasAuthorship W1521953619A5034940270 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C178288346 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C111472728 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C138885662 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C144024400 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C17744445 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C178288346 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C199539241 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C2778061430 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C74916050 @default.
• W1521953619 hasConceptScore W1521953619C95457728 @default.
• W1521953619 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1521953619 hasLocation W15219536191 @default.
• W1521953619 hasOpenAccess W1521953619 @default.
• W1521953619 hasPrimaryLocation W15219536191 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2047378000 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2112457552 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2917140954 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W2968210021 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W3003172080 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W3178085238 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W4313127773 @default.
• W1521953619 hasRelatedWork W4318426856 @default.
• W1521953619 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W1521953619 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1521953619 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1521953619 magId "1521953619" @default.
• W1521953619 workType "article" @default.