FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1524337732> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1524337732 endingPage "902" @default.
• W1524337732 startingPage "898" @default.
• W1524337732 abstract "Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy are acceptable treatment options for lower pole stones smaller than 10 mm, while percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the favoured treatment for stones larger than 20 mm. For treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm, flexible ureterorenoscopy has a significantly higher stone-free rate and lower retreatment rate than shock wave lithotripsy. OBJECTIVE • To compare the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm. PATIENTS AND METHODS • The database of patients with a single lower pole stone of 10–20 mm was examined to obtain two matched groups who were treated with F-URS or ESWL. Matching criteria were stone length, side and patient gender. • Stone-free rates were evaluated 3 months after the last treatment session by non-contrast computed tomography. Both groups were compared for retreatment rate, complications and stone-free rate. RESULTS • The matched groups included 37 patients who underwent F-URS and 62 patients who underwent ESWL. Retreatment rate was significantly higher for ESWL (60% vs 8%, P < 0.001). • Complications were more after F-URS (13.5% vs 4.8%), but the difference was not significant (P= 0.146). All complications were grade II or IIIa on modified Clavien classification. • The stone-free rate was significantly better after F-URS (86.5% vs 67.7%, P= 0.038). One failure of F-URS (2.7%) and five failures (8%) of ESWL were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. • Significant residual fragments in three patients (8%) after F-URS were treated with ESWL, while significant residual fragments after ESWL in five patients (8%) were treated with F-URS. Residual fragments (<4 mm) were followed every 3 months in one patient (2.7%) after F-URS and in 10 patients (16%) after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS • For treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm, F-URS provided significantly higher stone-free rate and lower retreatment rate compared with ESWL. • The incidence of complications after F-URS was not significantly more than after ESWL." @default.
• W1524337732 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1524337732 creator A5035404437 @default.
• W1524337732 creator A5042417730 @default.
• W1524337732 creator A5050036811 @default.
• W1524337732 creator A5062009245 @default.
• W1524337732 date "2012-02-28" @default.
• W1524337732 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1524337732 title "Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm" @default.
• W1524337732 cites W1487312889 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W1965121949 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2008259731 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2013728081 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2018236346 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2024866874 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2050867296 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2053940009 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2070494695 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2082071790 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2091821555 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2091847331 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2093995590 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2094277009 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2122481662 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2134683204 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2154316284 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2159476628 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W2232254545 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W3023298174 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W4232309651 @default.
• W1524337732 cites W77282757 @default.
• W1524337732 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.10961.x" @default.
• W1524337732 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22372915" @default.
• W1524337732 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1524337732 type Work @default.
• W1524337732 sameAs 1524337732 @default.
• W1524337732 citedByCount "122" @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322012 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322013 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322014 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322015 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322016 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322017 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322018 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322019 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322020 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322021 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322022 @default.
• W1524337732 countsByYear W15243377322023 @default.
• W1524337732 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1524337732 hasAuthorship W1524337732A5035404437 @default.
• W1524337732 hasAuthorship W1524337732A5042417730 @default.
• W1524337732 hasAuthorship W1524337732A5050036811 @default.
• W1524337732 hasAuthorship W1524337732A5062009245 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C2777756408 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C2780885103 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C126322002 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C126894567 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C141071460 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C2777756408 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C2777950166 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C2780813298 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C2780885103 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C2989005 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C3018023364 @default.
• W1524337732 hasConceptScore W1524337732C71924100 @default.
• W1524337732 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1524337732 hasLocation W15243377321 @default.
• W1524337732 hasLocation W15243377322 @default.
• W1524337732 hasOpenAccess W1524337732 @default.
• W1524337732 hasPrimaryLocation W15243377321 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W198406624 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W199580201 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2007516063 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2052349137 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2071521729 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2094250488 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2416109527 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2417039490 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W2468439780 @default.
• W1524337732 hasRelatedWork W4300518785 @default.
• W1524337732 hasVolume "110" @default.
• W1524337732 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1524337732 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1524337732 magId "1524337732" @default.
• W1524337732 workType "article" @default.