Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1529399052> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W1529399052 abstract "This editorial may be cited as: Badar A. Peer review management in the electronic age. J Postgrad Med Inst 2013; 27(3):233-4. The manuscript management softwares have now taken deep roots in the medical journalism. The switch over from ‘pen & paper editors’ to ‘electronic editors’ has swiftly occurred. A whole generation of charismatic ‘e-editors’ is now increasingly visible. The ‘pen & paper editors’ have either converted completely to ‘e-editors’ or they have included versatile ‘e-editors’ in their teams. This switch over has made managing an editorial office workflow tremendously easy. The main features of this fabulous comfort are more organized, fluent, standardized, ‘trackable’, reliable, sharable and easily transferrable solutions for routine tasks of editorial office. In addition, the editors can now manage their office 24/7 from anywhere at their convenience 1 . The major task of an editor rotates around manuscript management. The manuscript management softwares have made this cumbersome process very organized and standardized. The emails are automatically generated, deadlines notified and the reminders sent. The authors, the reviewers and the editors receive messages at every step of the peer review process making the task very systematic 2 . In this ‘e-atmosphere’ of extreme ‘e-praise’, I want to highlight a few ‘e-problems’ for medical journalism that I have noticed during this ‘e-conversion’ of peer review management. Some of my observations may appear ‘out of date’ and even cynical, however it would be great to initiate a discussion on this issue and hear to expert opinions before classifying these ‘e-problems’ related to dependence on the manuscript management softwares." @default.
- W1529399052 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1529399052 creator A5017030117 @default.
- W1529399052 date "2013-06-21" @default.
- W1529399052 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1529399052 title "PEER REVIEW MANAGEMENT IN THE ELECTRONIC AGE" @default.
- W1529399052 cites W1985522678 @default.
- W1529399052 cites W2003973208 @default.
- W1529399052 cites W2049210813 @default.
- W1529399052 cites W2058473858 @default.
- W1529399052 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W1529399052 type Work @default.
- W1529399052 sameAs 1529399052 @default.
- W1529399052 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W1529399052 countsByYear W15293990522013 @default.
- W1529399052 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1529399052 hasAuthorship W1529399052A5017030117 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C177212765 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C2775868214 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C32772713 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C111919701 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C136764020 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C138368954 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C138885662 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C15744967 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C162324750 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C177212765 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C17744445 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C187736073 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C199539241 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C27206212 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C2775868214 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C2780451532 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C32772713 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C41008148 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C542102704 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C71924100 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C77088390 @default.
- W1529399052 hasConceptScore W1529399052C98045186 @default.
- W1529399052 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W1529399052 hasLocation W15293990521 @default.
- W1529399052 hasOpenAccess W1529399052 @default.
- W1529399052 hasPrimaryLocation W15293990521 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W1529432272 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W172458813 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W1984057627 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W1984684671 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W1999509893 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2007801005 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2015025372 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2017792490 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2029492384 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2033315580 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2039149954 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2043261881 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2146091839 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2168021003 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2233131656 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2269316083 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W2552741604 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W3122609442 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W3136543248 @default.
- W1529399052 hasRelatedWork W3191953131 @default.
- W1529399052 hasVolume "27" @default.
- W1529399052 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1529399052 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1529399052 magId "1529399052" @default.
- W1529399052 workType "article" @default.