FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1532003295> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1532003295 abstract "After a spate of hate speech incidents involving nooses provoked outcry in 2007, the immediate response was regulation. A number of states passed laws proscribing the placing of a noose on private property with the intent to intimidate. This response reanimates the familiar debate between those who seek to ban hate speech - the “anti-subordination camp” - and those who oppose such prohibitions on speech - the “free speech camp.” At loggerheads since the movement to institute anti-hate speech laws first gathered momentum in the late 1980s, these two camps fundamentally disagree over how to reconcile the constitutional value of equality with the constitutional value of free speech. Those in the anti-subordination camp see hate speech as perpetuating systematic subordination and argue that regulating it is a crucial step toward achieving equality. Those in the free speech camp see such regulations not only as threatening freedom of expression but also as undermining key citizenship values and imposing an artificial rigidity on language itself. Debate between these two camps has long been at an impasse. This Article proposes a middle path: government speech. As the Supreme Court affirmed this term in Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, the First Amendment places no restrictions on the government’s own speech. This Article explores, for the first time, how the government can use its expressive power to intervene against hate speech. The government speaks to its citizens in myriad ways: through the speech of elected officials, through the dissemination of information, by exercising regulatory and editorial control over channels of mass communication, by selectively subsidizing individual speakers, by educating the nation’s students. First Amendment scholars have generally been wary of this power, fearing that it can impinge upon the free expression of individuals. The overwhelming scholarly emphasis has therefore been on curtailing government excesses, and little sustained attention has been given to the ways in which government speech might have a positive influence on expression while still respecting the values of free speech.This Article maps out and assesses an array of constitutionally permissible, non-regulatory interventions that government speakers might make against hate speech. These range from purely precatory speech - an elected official, for example, advising citizens of the historical connection between nooses and racially motivated violence - to forms of expression that possess a coercive power approaching that of regulation - a Congressionally maintained “blacklist,” for example, of individuals and organizations that promulgate hate speech. The Article then addresses anticipated objections to the various proposed interventions: the members of the anti-subordination camp may argue that government speech will be ineffectual; while the members of the free speech camp may argue that the First Amendment is offended when the government, even through non-binding measures, intentionally deters a specific kind of speech. In addition to evaluating the validity of these objections with respect to individual measures, the Article, on the one hand, questions the general assumption that regulation is a uniquely effective way to influence expression; and on the other hand, argues that outside the context of regulation, the First Amendment need not trump Fourteenth Amendment equality concerns." @default.
• W1532003295 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1532003295 creator A5008678106 @default.
• W1532003295 date "2010-04-01" @default.
• W1532003295 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1532003295 title "Hate Speech and Government Speech" @default.
• W1532003295 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1532003295 type Work @default.
• W1532003295 sameAs 1532003295 @default.
• W1532003295 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1532003295 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1532003295 hasAuthorship W1532003295A5008678106 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2776156098 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2777406531 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2778969159 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2988626085 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C35992214 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C119857082 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C138885662 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C144024400 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C15744967 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C17744445 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C18650270 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C199539241 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2776156098 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2776291640 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2777406531 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2778137410 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2778272461 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2778969159 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2988626085 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C2994536602 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C35992214 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C41008148 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C41895202 @default.
• W1532003295 hasConceptScore W1532003295C77805123 @default.
• W1532003295 hasLocation W15320032951 @default.
• W1532003295 hasOpenAccess W1532003295 @default.
• W1532003295 hasPrimaryLocation W15320032951 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W133078197 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W1531530617 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W1532481797 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W171117391 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W1731258889 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2040058058 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2048774434 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2221840523 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2266701299 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2293159586 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W2972505464 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3123037664 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3123689565 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3125570382 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3126067630 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3167519739 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3207366855 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W1673886101 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3123008987 @default.
• W1532003295 hasRelatedWork W3124874522 @default.
• W1532003295 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1532003295 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1532003295 magId "1532003295" @default.
• W1532003295 workType "article" @default.