FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1534092734> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1534092734 endingPage "733" @default.
• W1534092734 startingPage "726" @default.
• W1534092734 abstract "Object Surgical results in cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) evaluated with a patient-based method have not yet been reported. The purpose of this study was to examine patient satisfaction with surgery for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL and to clarify factors related to satisfaction. Methods Clinical data in 103 patients (74 male and 29 female) who underwent surgery for cervical OPLL were retrospectively reviewed. The average age at surgery was 57 years, and the average follow-up period was 9.3 years. Outcomes were assessed using an original satisfaction questionnaire, the conventional Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Spearman rank correlation coefficients for 5-scale patient satisfaction against outcome measures were calculated to test relationships between variables. All variables were compared between the satisfied (responses of very satisfied or satisfied) and dissatisfied (responses of dissatisfied or very dissatisfied) groups. Parameters exhibiting a significant Spearman rank correlation or difference between the groups were entered in a stepwise logistic regression analysis model, with satisfaction as the dependent variable. Results Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. There was not a significant difference in clinical data between these 69 study patients and the other 34 patients. Fifty-five patients (80%) were satisfied with the results of the surgery, and 58 patients (84%) reported that their condition was improved by the surgery. All patients who reported being very improved were either very satisfied or satisfied with the results of surgery. Quality of life (QOL), physical function (PF), and role physical (RP) were significantly correlated with patient satisfaction. The dissatisfied group had significantly more severe pain; lower maximum conventional JOA scores; lower maximum recovery rates; worse lower-extremity function (LEF); reduced QOL; and lower PF, RP, and vitality scores. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that PF, QOL, LEF, and maximum recovery rate based on JOA score were correlated with satisfaction. Conclusions Eighty percent of patients were satisfied with the surgical results after treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL. Surgery for cervical OPLL was effective, as evaluated by both doctor- and patient-based methods. Patient satisfaction was related to QOL, PF (especially LEF), and improvement." @default.
• W1534092734 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5000214180 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5001042153 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5011281701 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5018495383 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5034816822 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5054526123 @default.
• W1534092734 creator A5062655330 @default.
• W1534092734 date "2011-06-01" @default.
• W1534092734 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1534092734 title "Patient satisfaction with surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament" @default.
• W1534092734 cites W1954265004 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W1977142141 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W1983651115 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W1986313428 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W1988161571 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2016995932 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2028990297 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2037256677 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2040303958 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2051935072 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2052915486 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2055688751 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2074360831 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2076381969 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2086075896 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2138615216 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2142084040 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2165191059 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2166281097 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W2168477871 @default.
• W1534092734 cites W4251203629 @default.
• W1534092734 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.1.spine10649" @default.
• W1534092734 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21417695" @default.
• W1534092734 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1534092734 type Work @default.
• W1534092734 sameAs 1534092734 @default.
• W1534092734 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342012 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342013 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342014 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342015 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342016 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342017 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342018 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342019 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342021 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342022 @default.
• W1534092734 countsByYear W15340927342023 @default.
• W1534092734 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5000214180 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5001042153 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5011281701 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5018495383 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5034816822 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5054526123 @default.
• W1534092734 hasAuthorship W1534092734A5062655330 @default.
• W1534092734 hasBestOaLocation W15340927341 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C101601086 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2776667541 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2777604421 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2778842504 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2779492255 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C101601086 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C118552586 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C119857082 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C126322002 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C141071460 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C151956035 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C167135981 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C1862650 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2775944032 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2776667541 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2777604421 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2778842504 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2779492255 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C2780775167 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C41008148 @default.
• W1534092734 hasConceptScore W1534092734C71924100 @default.
• W1534092734 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1534092734 hasLocation W15340927341 @default.
• W1534092734 hasLocation W15340927342 @default.
• W1534092734 hasOpenAccess W1534092734 @default.
• W1534092734 hasPrimaryLocation W15340927341 @default.
• W1534092734 hasRelatedWork W1985732546 @default.
• W1534092734 hasRelatedWork W2024282325 @default.

• next