FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1535162693> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1535162693 endingPage "1829" @default.
• W1535162693 startingPage "1820" @default.
• W1535162693 abstract "Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR, or, more simply, NPT) studies, with or without the help of a recording computer (Rigiscan), have been traditionally positioned at the head of several erectile dysfunction (ED) diagnostic flowcharts with the aim to distinguish between psychogenic and organic etiology. Shall we continue to consider these tools as a diagnostic gold standard in ED diagnosis? Four scientists with expertise and/or interest in the area of ED pathophysiology and diagnosis were asked to contribute their opinions. To give to The Journal of Sexual Medicine's reader new stimuli to reexamine a still largely utilized tool utilized in sexual medicine's clinical practice. Of the four experts discussing the topic, the first who is the section editor of the Controversy section, believes that NPT/Rigiscan cannot be considered a useful diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis in ED. He is supported by the physiological considerations of the second expert and by the experimental evidence produced and discussed by the expert number four who questions the accuracy, reliability, and usefulness of these tools to measure a critical aspect of the erection physiology which is the adequate rigidity. In contrast, with several good arguments, the third expert still suggests the use of these tools, perhaps not for every man presenting with ED, but at least for the patient with no neurovascular risk factors who presents with a history suggestive of a psychogenic cause. The reader will judge if the expensive, complicated, and time-consuming effort to record nocturnal erectile activity is or is not useful anymore for the patient and for orienting the treatment choices. Jannini EA, Granata AM, Hatzimouratidis K, and Goldstein I. Use and abuse of rigiscan in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2009;6:1820–1829." @default.
• W1535162693 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1535162693 creator A5014078830 @default.
• W1535162693 creator A5077941636 @default.
• W1535162693 creator A5084907406 @default.
• W1535162693 creator A5087811410 @default.
• W1535162693 date "2009-07-01" @default.
• W1535162693 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1535162693 title "Controversies in Sexual Medicine: Use and Abuse of Rigiscan in the Diagnosis of Erectile Dysfunction" @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1759000468 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1888758698 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1899401240 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1967069595 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1971430493 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1987127345 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1987204652 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1993220594 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W1998959082 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2001610013 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2003599814 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2007853080 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2021885863 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2024197314 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2033370140 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2033386047 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2034571536 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2034962597 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2035764112 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2037405154 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2045602122 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2054313134 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2057426299 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2060408693 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2065015658 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2076693318 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2088346074 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2094423278 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2111669404 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2132173242 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2170504637 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2321635499 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2330261413 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2332624172 @default.
• W1535162693 cites W2412734941 @default.
• W1535162693 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01343.x" @default.
• W1535162693 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19575775" @default.
• W1535162693 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1535162693 type Work @default.
• W1535162693 sameAs 1535162693 @default.
• W1535162693 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932012 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932013 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932014 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932015 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932016 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932017 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932018 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932019 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932020 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932021 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932022 @default.
• W1535162693 countsByYear W15351626932023 @default.
• W1535162693 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1535162693 hasAuthorship W1535162693A5014078830 @default.
• W1535162693 hasAuthorship W1535162693A5077941636 @default.
• W1535162693 hasAuthorship W1535162693A5084907406 @default.
• W1535162693 hasAuthorship W1535162693A5087811410 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C137627325 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C160146798 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C2776572759 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C2779180768 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C2779929075 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C2780282741 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C3020768380 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C11171543 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C118552586 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C126322002 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C137627325 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C15744967 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C160146798 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C177713679 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C2776572759 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C2779180768 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C2779929075 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C2780282741 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C3020768380 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C40993552 @default.
• W1535162693 hasConceptScore W1535162693C71924100 @default.
• W1535162693 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W1535162693 hasLocation W15351626931 @default.
• W1535162693 hasLocation W15351626932 @default.

• next