FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1537320568> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1537320568 abstract "Background Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem. A key method of surgical fixation is percutaneous pinning, involving the insertion of wires through the skin to stabilise the fracture. Objectives To evaluate the evidence from randomised controlled trials for the use of percutaneous pinning for fractures of the distal radius in adults. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (September 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled clinical trials involving adults with a fracture of the distal radius, which compared percutaneous pinning with conservative treatment, or different aspects of percutaneous pinning. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed and extracted data from the included trials. Some pooling of data was undertaken for one comparison. Main results Thirteen trials, involving 940 generally older adults with dorsally displaced and potentially or evidently unstable distal radial fractures, were included. Methodological weaknesses among these trials included lack of allocation concealment and inadequate outcome assessment. Factors affecting the applicability of trial evidence included inconsistent fracture classification, variations in outcome assessment and incomplete reporting. Six heterogeneous trials compared percutaneous pinning with plaster cast immobilisation. Across‐fracture pinning, used in five trials, was associated with improved anatomical outcome and generally minor complications. There was some indication of similar or improved function in the pinning group. One quasi‐randomised trial found an excess of complications after Kapandji pinning. Three trials compared different methods of pinning. Two trials found a higher incidence of complications after Kapandji fixation compared with two methods of across‐fracture fixation. The third trial provided inadequate evidence for modified Kapandji fixation versus Willenegger fixation. Two small trials comparing biodegradable pins versus metal pins found a significant excess of complications associated with biodegradable material. Two small trials compared plaster cast immobilisation for one week versus for six weeks after surgery. One trial found duration of immobilisation after trans‐styloid fixation did not have a significant effect on outcome. More complications occurred in the early mobilisation group after Kapandji pinning in the second trial. Authors' conclusions Though there is some evidence to support its use, the precise role and methods of percutaneous pinning are not established. The higher rates of complications with Kapandji pinning and biodegradable materials casts some doubt on their general use." @default.
• W1537320568 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1537320568 creator A5037245920 @default.
• W1537320568 creator A5044824382 @default.
• W1537320568 creator A5060758173 @default.
• W1537320568 date "2007-07-18" @default.
• W1537320568 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W1537320568 title "Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults" @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1600041372 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1757592262 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1896498956 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1907328253 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1924613311 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1971657756 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1974770262 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1982148480 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1986401603 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W1988249974 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2019999744 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2024178514 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2036482981 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2039175508 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2044826872 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W205387706 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2064730863 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2078512672 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2095524302 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2099246185 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2104990253 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2105060964 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2118100789 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2171463728 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2171773841 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2254668011 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2256795794 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2293555668 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2295332723 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2316245310 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2439232582 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W2987003872 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W348890620 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W3580357 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W4230310043 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W4242406745 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W4244132297 @default.
• W1537320568 cites W4251064022 @default.
• W1537320568 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006080.pub2" @default.
• W1537320568 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7007181" @default.
• W1537320568 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32032439" @default.
• W1537320568 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1537320568 type Work @default.
• W1537320568 sameAs 1537320568 @default.
• W1537320568 citedByCount "63" @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682012 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682013 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682014 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682015 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682016 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682017 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682018 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682019 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682020 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682021 @default.
• W1537320568 countsByYear W15373205682022 @default.
• W1537320568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1537320568 hasAuthorship W1537320568A5037245920 @default.
• W1537320568 hasAuthorship W1537320568A5044824382 @default.
• W1537320568 hasAuthorship W1537320568A5060758173 @default.
• W1537320568 hasBestOaLocation W15373205681 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2779647303 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C2991898622 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C126322002 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C141071460 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C168563851 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C17744445 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C199539241 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2778216619 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2779473830 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2779647303 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2780660378 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2780813298 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C2991898622 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C535046627 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C71924100 @default.
• W1537320568 hasConceptScore W1537320568C95190672 @default.
• W1537320568 hasLocation W15373205681 @default.
• W1537320568 hasLocation W15373205682 @default.

• next