FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1540184498> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1540184498 endingPage "293" @default.
• W1540184498 startingPage "279" @default.
• W1540184498 abstract "Purpose Recently, the focus of UK and European flood risk management policy has been towards promoting the uptake of property level flood adaptation measures. Despite this focus, the take‐up of property level flood adaptation measures (both resilient and resistant) remains very low. One of the apparent barriers to uptake is the cost of installing such measures. This study aims to investigate the cost of adopting resilient reinstatement measures by considering a small number of actual properties that were flooded in Cockermouth during 2009. Design/methodology/approach Secondary data obtained from a loss adjusting company provides the basis for analysis. The data take into consideration the cost benefit of resilient repair, assuming the same properties were flooded again. The traditional reinstatement costs were established as the actual cost of putting the properties back in a like‐for‐like manner while resilient reinstatement costs were established by creating new resilient repair schedules based on recommended good practice. Findings The results of the study show that the percentage extra cost for resilient reinstatement over traditional repair cost ranged from 23 to 58 per cent with a mean of 34 per cent depending on the house type. However, while resilient repairs were found to be more expensive than traditional (i.e. like‐for‐like) methods, they were found to significantly reduce the repair costs assuming a subsequent flood were to take place. Resilient flood mitigation measures seem most promising and, given repeat flooding, will help in limiting the cost of repairs up to as much as 73 per cent for properties with a 20 per cent annual chance of flooding, which indicates that the up‐front investment would be recovered following a single subsequent flood event. Originality/value The uptake of resilient reinstatement among the floodplain property owners in the UK is very low and one of the reasons for the low uptake is lack of understanding of the cost and benefit of adopting such measures. While there have been previous studies towards investigating the costs of resilient reinstatement, it is believed that this is the first to use real claims data and information to analyse the tangible costs/benefits of resilient reinstatement." @default.
• W1540184498 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1540184498 creator A5009686598 @default.
• W1540184498 creator A5040303542 @default.
• W1540184498 creator A5048326537 @default.
• W1540184498 creator A5072542943 @default.
• W1540184498 date "2011-08-30" @default.
• W1540184498 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W1540184498 title "An analysis of the costs of resilient reinstatement of flood affected properties" @default.
• W1540184498 cites W1964184411 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W2086623778 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W2123995208 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W2156345725 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W2481260660 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W2489933628 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W4241463503 @default.
• W1540184498 cites W4252238041 @default.
• W1540184498 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162350" @default.
• W1540184498 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1540184498 type Work @default.
• W1540184498 sameAs 1540184498 @default.
• W1540184498 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982012 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982013 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982014 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982015 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982016 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982017 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982018 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982019 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982020 @default.
• W1540184498 countsByYear W15401844982022 @default.
• W1540184498 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1540184498 hasAuthorship W1540184498A5009686598 @default.
• W1540184498 hasAuthorship W1540184498A5040303542 @default.
• W1540184498 hasAuthorship W1540184498A5048326537 @default.
• W1540184498 hasAuthorship W1540184498A5072542943 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C139807058 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C182299520 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C186594467 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C188198153 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C2779585090 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C2993630001 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C74256435 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C107826830 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C112930515 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C120665830 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C121332964 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C121955636 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C127413603 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C139807058 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C144133560 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C15744967 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C166957645 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C182299520 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C186594467 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C188198153 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C205649164 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C21547014 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C2779585090 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C2993630001 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C39432304 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C542102704 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C74256435 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C78519656 @default.
• W1540184498 hasConceptScore W1540184498C97355855 @default.
• W1540184498 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1540184498 hasLocation W15401844981 @default.
• W1540184498 hasOpenAccess W1540184498 @default.
• W1540184498 hasPrimaryLocation W15401844981 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2031888665 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2150458128 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2532971074 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2832872513 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2913922657 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2923835640 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W4221037648 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W4246301206 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W4366964060 @default.
• W1540184498 hasRelatedWork W2478988504 @default.
• W1540184498 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W1540184498 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1540184498 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next